Outline
Figures
Tables

Volume: 02, Issue: 01, Page: 1-2

The vulnerability of aquatic invertebrates to climate change: A threat to ecosystem stability

1 Department of Animal Science and Fishery, Faculty of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia Kampus Bintulu Sarawak, Jalan Nyabau, 97008 Bintulu, Sarawak, Malaysia

*Corresponding authors

Email address: hadihamli@upm.edu.my (Hadi Hamli)

doi: https://doi.org/10.69517/aier.2025.02.01.0001 

Share:

Received:
01 January 2025

Revised:
08 January 2025

Accepted:
08 January 2025

Published:
08 January 2025

Highlights

  • Aquatic invertebrates highly impacted by climate change.
  • Population changes disrupt food webs, biodiversity.
  • Acidification, hypoxia, habitat loss harm species.
  • Protected areas, sustainable practices, and adaptive management are essential.
  • Study stressors, models, and awareness to protect aquatic organisms.

Abstract

Climate change represents one of the most pressing global environmental challenges of the 21st century. Among the various ecosystems affected, aquatic environments critical for biodiversity, fisheries, and global carbon cycling are particularly vulnerable. Aquatic invertebrates, key players in aquatic food webs, are highly sensitive to climate change stressors, including rising temperatures, ocean acidification, and hypoxia. These stressors threaten not only the survival of these organisms but also the broader ecosystem stability. This editorial provides an overview of the current understanding of the impacts of climate change on aquatic invertebrates, highlights ongoing research, and suggests policy and management strategies to mitigate these effects. Urgent action is required to protect these critical organisms and preserve the ecosystem services they provide.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Climate change, Aquatic invertebrates, Ecosystem stability, Biodiversity, Conservation strategies

Introduction

Climate change is a global environmental crisis that threatens ecosystems worldwide. Aquatic ecosystems, crucial for maintaining biodiversity, supporting fisheries, and regulating global carbon cycles, are particularly vulnerable to these changes. Among the most affected organisms are aquatic invertebrates, which are sensitive to fluctuations in temperature, oxygen levels, and water acidity. Understanding how climate change impacts these groups is critical for preserving the elusive balance of aquatic ecosystems and safeguarding the biodiversity that sustains them.
Global climate change affects aquatic invertebrates through various mechanisms. Rising temperatures influence their metabolism, growth, and reproductive cycles, often leading to physiological stress and population changes (Collier et al., 2017). Oxygen depletion, or hypoxia, caused by reduced oxygen solubility in warmer waters, compromises respiration and survival for many species (Breitburg et al., 2018). Ocean acidification, driven by increased carbon dioxide absorption, reduces the availability of carbonate needed for shell formation, threatening species like mollusks and crustaceans (Mai & Chen, 2024). Furthermore, climate-induced habitat alterations, such as shifts in habitat distribution, wetland loss, and changes in freshwater systems, further threaten species diversity and ecosystem stability (Oliver and Morecroft, 2014). These combined effects highlight the exposure of aquatic invertebrates to ongoing climate change.
The effects of climate change on aquatic ecosystems are broad. Disruptions to invertebrate populations trigger dropping impacts throughout the food web. As the abundance and distribution of invertebrates alter, fish, birds, and mammals that depend on them for food may suffer, destabilizing the entire ecosystem. This can lead to reduced biodiversity, with sensitive species at a higher risk of extinction, which diminishes the overall resilience of the ecosystem (Mori et al., 2013). Moreover, the decline in invertebrate populations disrupts essential biogeochemical cycles, affecting nutrient cycling, sediment turnover, and water filtration, ultimately compromising the health of aquatic environments (Prather et al., 2013).
Recent studies highlight the significant impact of climate change on both freshwater and marine invertebrates. Temperature increases are driving range alterations and population declines in freshwater species, such as freshwater shrimp and freshwater snails (Cordellier et al., 2012; Tropea et al., 2015). Ocean acidification presents a serious challenge for marine ecosystems, particularly coral reefs, where reduced carbonate availability threatens coral survival and disrupts invertebrate communities. Additionally, hypoxia in coastal zones, often resulting in “dead zones,” severely impacts benthic invertebrates by depleting oxygen levels, which reduces survival rates and alters community structures (Altieri and Diaz, 2018; Breitburg et al., 2018). These situations emphasize the complex impact of climate change on invertebrate populations and the ecosystems they support.
Effective conservation efforts are essential to mitigating the effects of climate change on aquatic ecosystems. Strategies such as the establishment of protected areas, habitat restoration, and biodiversity preservation are critical for safeguarding vulnerable species (Ranius et al., 2023). Adaptive management approaches, which use monitoring tools to track and respond to climate induced changes, offer dynamic solutions to evolving ecosystem conditions (Malhi et al., 2020). Furthermore, implementing sustainable practices, such as reducing CO2 emissions, controlling pollution, and managing fisheries responsibly is essential for promoting long-term ecosystem resilience.
Addressing key research gaps is crucial for understanding the full extent of climate change’s impact on aquatic ecosystems. Comprehensive studies on the synergistic effects of multiple stressors, such as temperature fluctuations, oxygen depletion, and acidification, are needed. Technological advancements, like predictive models, can help forecast ecosystem responses and guide management strategies. Additionally, community engagement and education are essential to raising awareness about the importance of aquatic ecosystems and promoting climate adaptation strategies that encourage collective action.
Addressing climate change is urgently needed to protect aquatic biodiversity and the essential ecosystem services provided by aquatic environments. The degradation of these ecosystems has influential consequences for both natural ecosystems and human well-being, affecting food security, water quality, and climate regulation. It is essential for both global and local efforts to mitigate climate change impacts and adapt to the changing conditions that threaten aquatic environments. Through concerted action, we can preserve aquatic biodiversity and ensure the sustainability of the services they offer for future generations.

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank the technical support of Department of Animal Science and Fishery, Faculty of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia Bintulu Sarawak Campus.

Ethical approval statement

None to declare.

Data availability

Not applicable.

Informed consent statement

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author contributions

Hadi Hamli: Conceptualization, writing first draft, review and revision. All of the enlisted authors have read and approved the final version of the published editorial.

References

Altieri A and Diaz RJ, 2018. Dead zones: Oxygen depletion in coastal ecosystems. In: World Seas: An Environmental Evaluation Volume III: Ecological Issues and Environmental Impacts (pp. 453–473). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-805052-1.00021-8

Breitburg D, Levin LA, Oschlies A, Grégoire M, Chavez FP, Conley DJ, Garçon,V, Gilbert D, Gutiérrez D, Isensee K, Jacinto GS, Limburg KE, Montes I, Naqvi SWA, Pitcher GC, Rabalais NN, Roman MR, Rose KA, Seibel BA and Zhang J, 2018. Declining oxygen in the global ocean and coastal waters. Science, 359 (6371): eaam7240. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam7240

Collier RJ, Renquist BJ and Xiao Y, 2017. A 100-year review: Stress physiology including heat stress. Journal of Dairy Science, 100(12): 10367–10380. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13676

Cordellier M, Pfenninger A, Streit B and Pfenninger M, 2012. Assessing the effects of climate change on the distribution of pulmonate freshwater snail biodiversity. Marine Biology, 159(11): 2519–2531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-012-1894-9

Mai R and Chen L, 2024. Impacts of ocean acidification on marine ecosystems and mitigation strategies. International Journal of Marine Science, 14(3): 231-244. https://doi.org/10.5376/ijms.2024.14.0027

Malhi Y, Franklin J, Seddon N, Solan M, Turner MG, Field CB and Knowlton N, 2020. Climate change and ecosystems: Threats, opportunities and solutions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 375: 1794. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0104

Mori AS, Furukawa T and Sasaki T, 2013. Response diversity determines the resilience of ecosystems to environmental change. Biological Reviews, 88(2): 349–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12004

Oliver TH and Morecroft MD 2014. Interactions between climate change and land use change on biodiversity: Attribution problems, risks, and opportunities. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 5(3): 317–335. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.271

Prather CM, Pelini SL, Laws A, Rivest E, Woltz M, Bloch CP, Del Toro I, Ho CK, Kominoski J, Newbold TAS, Parsons S and Joern A, 2013. Invertebrates, ecosystem services and climate change. Biological Reviews, 88(2): 327–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12002

Ranius T, Widenfalk LA, Seedre M, Lindman L, Felton A, Hämäläinen A and Filyushkina A, 2023. Protected area designation and management in a world of climate change: A review of recommendations. Ambio, 52: 68–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-022-01779-z

Tropea C, Stumpf L and Greco LSL, 2015. Effect of temperature on biochemical composition, growth and reproduction of the ornamental red cherry shrimp Neocaridina heteropoda heteropoda (Decapoda, Caridea). PLoS ONE, 10(3): e0119468. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119468

 

CrossMark Update
CROSSMARK Color horizontal
Article Metrics
[stm-calc id="1576"]