Climate-resilient crops: Integration of molecular tools into conventional breeding
Show More
Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Dhaka-1207, Bangladesh
*Corresponding authors
Email address: rahimgepb@sau.edu.bd (Md. Abdur Rahim)
Share:
Received:
03 January 2025
Revised:
06 January 2025
Accepted:
08 January 2025
Published:
10 January 2025
Highlights
- Climate change is adversely affect the crop production causing significant yield losses.
- Climate-resilient crop varieties can address this issue.
- Integration of advanced molecular tools with conventional breeding is essential to develop climate-resilient crop varieties and ensuring food security.
Abstract
Crop production is negatively impacted by climate change, which may increase yield losses and reduce the output of crops that are subjected to harsh environmental conditions.Therefore, we need to develop climate-resilient crop varieties to cope with abiotic and biotic stresses. Plant breeding has successfully developed improved crop varieties by applying conventional tools and methodologies where plants are selected based on superior performances (phenotypes). Numerous external environmental factors can affect plant phenotypes, which reduces the accuracy of selection based solely on phenotypic expression. Furthermore, it is time-consuming, and challenging to investigate complex traits like abiotic and biotic stress tolerance/resistance. To mitigate this issue, genomics equips plant breeders with cutting-edge molecular techniques for genome-wide study and makes genotype-phenotype analysis possible. This facilitates the precise and efficient development of climate-resilient crop varieties using genomic approaches, like ‘genomic selection’, ‘marker-assisted selection’ (MAS), ‘marker-assisted backcrossing’ (MABC), ‘quantitative trait loci’ (QTL) mapping and ‘genome editing’. These high-throughput modern techniques help to identify important traits, provide better insight into genetic diversity, and significantly accelerate breeding programs. Moreover, revolutionary technology like ‘CRISPR-Cas9’-mediated genome editing allows precise gene editing, accelerating the breeding process significantly. ‘High-throughput phenotyping’ (HTP), ‘genomic selection’, and MAS help to select specific traits that are responsible for enhanced crop production, stress tolerance, and improved disease resistance. Such molecular tools are invaluable for transferring complex traits affected by various environmental conditions. Ensuring food security and addressing the challenges of climate change, the integration of advanced molecular tools with conventional breeding is essential to produce climate-resilient crops.
Graphical abstract
Keywords
Climate-resilient crop, Breeding, Marker assisted selection, Genomic selection, CRISPR-Cas9
Introduction
Climate change poses a serious threat to agriculture, considerably impeding agricultural output by altering weather patterns and escalating extreme occurrences like heat waves, severe droughts, salinity, and floods, which are made worse by biotic stressors such as pathogens, nematodes, insects, and weeds (Delarue et al., 2025). Drought, salinity, and heat stress are critical abiotic factors that adversely impact plant growth, development, and reproductive processes (Sato et al., 2024). This poses a serious threat to food security and causes substantial losses in agricultural products. To address this pressing challenge, plant breeding plays an important role in developing climate-resilient crops, thereby ensuring sustainable food production. Around 10,000 years ago, ever since the domestication of plants began, plant breeding has been extensively successful in developing crops and varieties that are essential to the development of modern society, and consistently outperformed (neo-)Malthusian predictions (Fedoroff, 2010). Conventional breeding methodologies have played a pivotal role in developing modern cultivars, substantially enhancing the yield of key crops since the middle of the 20th century onward (Perez-de-Castro et al., 2012). Over the past 150 years, plant breeding has had significant success in reducing the life cycle of crop plants, enabling other major crops o integrate in one cropping year (Ahmar et al., 2020). It is projected that the world population will be 9.7 billion by 2050, and by 2100, there will be roughly 10.9 billion (Gu et al., 2021). The global need for food will significantly increase substantially to address the demands of an expanding population, whereas several biotic and abiotic challenges imposed by climate change continue to impede crop productivity (Gull et al., 2019). In order to satisfy the demand of the expanding population, food production must increase by an estimated 70-100% (Foley et al., 2011). Conventional breeding is a time-consuming process, often requiring over 10 years to develop and release a new cultivar (Bharti and Chimata, 2019). Dealing with complex traits like abiotic and biotic stress tolerance/resistance is complicated and time consuming in conventional breeding and are significantly influenced by genotype-environment interactions leading to inaccuracies in breeding objectives (Lema, 2018). On the contrary, genomic approaches are advantageous for investigating these complex traits, as such characteristics are typically polygenic and significantly affected by environmental influences. In this modern era, breeders can use genomics-based methods and sophisticated molecular tools, including ‘genomic selection’, ‘markers-assisted selection’ (MAS), ‘marker-assisted backcrossing’ (MABC), ‘quantitative trait loci’ (QTL) mapping, and ‘genome editing’ (Figure 1), to facilitate precise and efficient genetic improvements (Kumar et al., 2024).
Genomic election has effectively identified small-effect genes associated with multiple QTLs, which are important in plant breeding as they regulate the majority of important economic and agronomic traits (Robertsen et al., 2019). MAS is a technique that employs DNA markers to recognize the genomic regions to a specific traits in plants (Das et al., 2017).
Molecular markers (SNP, InDel, RAPD, SSR, ISSR, etc.) play a vital role in QTL mapping of stress-related genes, such as drought and salinity tolerance genes, which regulate responses to these environmental stresses (Younis et al., 2020). High-throughput phenotyping (HTP) enables detailed information on diverse phenotypic traits like stress tolerance, disease resistance, growth, and crop yield (Shakoor et al., 2017). A cutting-edge genome editing technique, CRISPR-Cas9 holds great promise for use in contemporary crop breeding (Riaz et al., 2021; Dutta, 2024). It has shown substantial potential in the development of climate-resilient crop cultivars (Razzaq et al., 2022). With the advancement in science and technologies, plant breeding is also evolving day by day. The prospect of plant breeding is dependent on technological advances through the application of molecular tools, genomic technologies, precision breeding technologies, and the development of crop varieties resilient to stresses, contributing to worldwide food security. The advanced genomics tools not only save the time of the breeding program but are also of great value for the transfer of complex traits to tackle the issues of food security, climate change impacts, and sustainable crop production. Improving the productivity, efficiency, and speed of conventional breeding programs, requires the integration of molecular tools to develop climate-resilient crop varieties.
Acknowledgements
None to declare.
Ethical approval statement
None to declare.
Data availability
Not applicable.
Informed consent statement
Not applicable.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interests.
Author contributions
Conceptualization: Md. Abdur Rahim; Writing original drat: Md. Nahid Hasan and Md. Abdur Rahim; Figure preparation: Md. Nahid Hasan; Final reviewed and revised: Md. Abdur Rahim. Both authors critically reviewed and edited the manuscript and agreed to submit the final version of the editorial.
Reference
(Barua and Das, 2018)
Barua P and Das J, 2018. Entrepreneurship Barriers to Freshwater Prawn Culture in South-Eastern Bangladesh. IUP Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 15(4): 26-45.
Reference
FAO (2016)
FAO (Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations), 2016. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture. FAO, Rome, pp. 200.
Reference
(Azad and Azad, 2022)
Azad KN and Azad KN, 2022. Current status and chronological development of fisheries and aquaculture in Bangladesh. Journal of Bioscience and Agriculture Research, 29(02): 2484-2496. https://doi.org/10.18801/jbar.290222.300
Reference
(López‐Huerta et al., 2021)
López‐Huerta JM, Vega‐Villasante F, Ponce‐Palafox JT, Badillo Zapata D, Martínez Cárdenas L and Flores Alencaster OA, 2021. Growth, production, and feeding efficiency of freshwater, Longarm River prawn Macrobrachium tenellum at different densities in nursery phase culture under intensive conditions. North American Journal of Aquaculture, 83(3): 192-202. https://doi.org/10.1002/naaq.10188
Reference
(Gaytán-Pinzón et al., 2022).
Ogello EO, Outa NO, Obiero KO, Kyule DN and Munguti JM, 2021. The prospects of biofloc technology (BFT) for sustainable aquaculture development. Scientific African, 14: 01053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2021.e01053
Reference
(Mugwanya et al., 2021)
Mugwanya M, Dawood MA, Kimera F and Sewilam H, 2021. Biofloc systems for sustainable production of economically important aquatic species: A review. Sustainability, 13(13): 7255. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137255
Reference
(Crab et al., 2012)
Crab R, Defoirdt T, Bossier P and Verstraete W, 2012. Biofloc technology in aquaculture: beneficial effects and future challenges. Aquaculture, 356: 351-356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2012.04.046
Reference
(Bossier and Ekasari, 2017)
Bossier P and Ekasari J, 2017. Biofloc technology application in aquaculture to support sustainable development goals. Microbial Biotechnology, 10(5): 1012-1016. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.12836
Reference
(Emerenciano et al., 2017)
Emerenciano MGC, Martínez-Córdova LR, Martínez-Porchas M and Miranda-Baeza A, 2017. Biofloc technology (BFT): a tool for water quality management in aquaculture. Water Quality, 5: 92-109. https://doi.org/10.5772/66416
Reference
(Mugwanya et al., 2021)
Abdullah A, Putri A and Nurilmala M, 2024. Specific primer design for detection of gene Cyt. b for shark species Prionace glauca and gene COI for Carcharhinus spp. using real-time PCR method. BIO Web of Conferences, 92: 01008. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20249201008
Reference
(Bybee et al., 2021).
Bybee SM, Kalkman VJ, Erickson RJ, Frandsen PB, Breinholt, JW, Suvorov A and Ware JL, 2021. Phylogeny and classification of Odonata using targeted genomics. Molecular Phylogenetic and Evolution, 160: 107115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2021.107115
Reference
(Dijkstra et al., 2014).
Dijkstra KD, Monaghan MT and Pauls SU, 2014. Freshwater biodiversity and aquatic insect diversification. Annual Review of Entomology, 59: 143-63. http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-011613-161958
Reference
(Letsch and Gottsberger, 2016).
Letsch HB and Gottsberger JLW, 2016. Not going with the flow: a comprehensive time-calibrated phylogeny of dragonflies (Anisoptera: Odonata: Insecta) provides evidence for the role of lentic habitats on diversification. Molecular Ecology, 25(6): 1340-1353. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mec.13562
Reference
(Casas et al., 2018).
Casas PAS, Sing KW, Lee PS, Nuñeza OM, Villanueva RJT and Wilson JJ, 2018. DNA barcodes for dragonflies and damselflies (Odonata) of Mindanao, Philippines. Mitochondrial DNA Part A, 29: 206–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/24701394.2016.1267157
Reference
Ali and Khidhir (2015).
Ali WK and Khidhir AS, 2015. Morphological study of the Sympetrum arenicolor Jödicke, 1994 (Odonata: Libellulidae) collected in Kurdistan Région-Iraq. Entomology, Ornithology and Herpetology; 4(4): 100- 118. https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-0983.1000168
Reference
Abd and Al-Asady (2014)
Abd IF and Al-Asady HS, 2014. External morphological study of Selysiothemis nigra (Van der linden, 1825) (Odonata: Libellulidae). Journal of Karbala University, the 2nd scientific conference for college of science, (special issue): 31-41. (In Arabic).
Reference
Al-Hashmi (2017)
Al-Hashmi AH, 2017. External morphological study of the Sympetrum fonscolombei (Selys, 1840) (Odonata: Anisoptera: Libellulidae) in Baghdad. AlMustansiriyah Journal of Science, 28(2): 11-15. http://doi.org/10.23851/mjs.v28i2.494
Reference
Darweesh (2018)
Darweesh HS, 2018. Identification and ecological study to some species of nymph Order Odonata: Insecta and ability to use it in biological control in Basra Province. MSc thesis. College of Agriculture- University of Basrah, Iraq. pp. 117. (In Arabic)
Reference
Ahmed and Kareem (2019)
Ahmed HK and Kareem DK, 2019. Morphological study of three native Odonata species from Basrah Governorate– South of Iraq. International Journal of Biosciences, 14(5): 141-155
Reference
Ahmed and Kareem (2020)
Ahmed HA and Kareem DK, 2020. Seasonal variations in diversity and the relative abundance of naiads from the temporary pools in Basrah Province- Southern Iraq. Iraqi Journal of Aquaculture, 17: 27-48. https://doi.org/10.58629/ijaq.v17i1.92
Reference
Ahmed and Kareem (2024)
Ahmed HK and Kareem DK, 2024. Morphological identification of Dragonflies naiads (Odonata: Anisoptera) from temporary ponds in Basrah Province, South of Iraq. Iraqi Journal of Aquaculture, 21: 89-109. https://doi.org/10.58629/ijaq.v21i1.513
Reference
Geraci et al. (2011)
Geraci CJ, Zhou X and Al-Saffar M, 2011. Barcoding Iraq: Aquatic insects of the Tigris/Euphrates River basin useful for biosurveillance. 4th International Barcode of Life Conference, Adelaide, Australia. http://dx.doi.org/10.1899/10-011
Reference
Degabriele (2013)
Degabriele G, 2013. An overview of the dragonflies and damselflies of the Maltese Islands (Central Mediterranean) (Odonata). Bulletin of the Entomological Society of Malta, 6: 5–127. https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/1502
Reference
(Lim et al., 2011)
Lim SG, Shin SL and Seokhwan H, 2011. Design and use of group-specific primers and probes for real-team quantitative PCR, Front. Environmental Science and Engineering of China, 5: 28-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-011-0302-x
Reference
Lee et al. (2012)
Lee PY, Costumbrado J, Hsu CY and Kim YH, 2012. Agarose gel electrophoresis for the separation of DNA fragments. Journal of Visualized Experiments, 20(62): 3923. https://doi.org/10.3791/3923
Reference
(Ibragimov and Has' Minskii, 2013)
Ibragimov IA and Has' Minskii RZ, 2013. Statistical estimation: Asymptotic theory. Springer Science and Business Media. pp. 401. https://www.abebooks.com/9780387905235
Reference
(Kumar et al., 2016)
Kumar S, Stecher G and Tamura K, 2016. MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Molecular, Biology and Evolution, 33(7): 1870-4. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw054
Reference
(Jin et al., 2022)
Jin S, JinKwang Y, Kim KY, Kim MS, Kim C and Park CP, 2022. An assessment of the taxonomic reliability of DNA barcode sequences in publicly available databases. Algae, 35(3): 293-301. https://doi.org/10.4490/algae.2020.35.9.4
Reference
(Zheng et al., 2023)
Zheng L, Wang H, Lin J, Zhou Y, Xiao J and Li K, 2023. Population genomics provides insights into the genetic diversity and adaptation of the Pieris rapae in China. PLoS One, 18(11): e0294521. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294521
Reference
(Huang et al., 2020)
Huang ST, Wang HR, Yang WQ, Si YC, Wang YT, Sun ML, Qi X and Bai Y, 2020. Phylogeny of Libellulidae (Odonata: Anisoptera): comparison of molecular and morphology-based phylogenies based on wing morphology and migration. PeerJ, 14(8): e8567. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8567
Reference
(Sacchi and Hardersen, 2013)
Sacchi R and Hardersen S, 2013. Wing length allometry in Odonata: differences between families in relation to migratory behavioour. Zoomorphology, 132: 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00435-012-0172-1
Reference
(Jisha Krishnan and Sebastian, 2015 a)
Jisha Krishnan EK and Sebastian CD, 2015a. Analysis of evolutionary divergence of Neurothemis tullia (Odonata: Libellulidae) using cytochrome oxidase subunit I gene. International Journal of Advanced Life Sciences, 8: 2320-1821. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281364538
Reference
(Jisha Krishnan and Sebastian, 2015 b)
Jisha Krishnan EK, Sebastian CD, 2015b. Genetic and phylogenetic assessment of sexually dimorphic species, Diplacodes trivialis (Odonata: Libellulidae) using cytochrome oxidase I gene. International Journal of Pure and Applied Biosciences, 3: 317-320.
Reference
Corbet (1999)
Corbet PS, 1999. Dragonflies: Behavior and Ecology of Odonata. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, pp. 829. https://www.cornellpress.cornell.edu/book/9780801425929
References
Ahmar S, Gill RA., Jung KH, Faheem A, Qasim MU, Mubeen M and Zhou W, 2020. Conventional and molecular techniques from simple breeding to speed breeding in crop plants: Recent advances and future outlook. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21: 2590. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21072590
Bharti G and Chimata M, 2019. Review on new plant breeding techniques. International Journal of Science and Research, 8(4): 723–730.
Das G, Patra JK and Baek KH, 2017. Insight into MAS: A molecular tool for development of stress resistant and quality of rice through gene stacking. Frontiers in Plant Science, 8: 985. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00985
Delarue M, Benhamed M and Fragkostefanakis S, 2025. The role of epigenetics in tomato stress adaptation. New Crops, 2: 100044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ncrops.2024.100044
Dutta KK, 2024. CRISPR-dCas9-mediated CpG island editing: A potential game-changer for diabetes treatment. Journal of Bioscience and Environment Research, 2: 1-3. https://doi.org/10.69517/jber.2025.02.01.0003
Fedoroff NV, 2010. The past, present and future of crop genetic modification. New Biotechnology, 27(5): 461-465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2009.12.004
Foley, JA, Ramankutty N, Brauman KA, Cassidy ES, Gerber JS, Johnston M, Mueller ND, O’Connell C, Ray DK, West PC, Balzer C, Bennett EM, Carpenter SR, Hill J, Monfreda C, Polasky S, Rockström J, Sheehan J, Siebert S, Tilman D and Zaks DPM, 2011. Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature, 478: 337–342. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10452
Gu D, Andreev K and Dupre ME, 2021. Major trends in population growth around the world. China CDC Weekly, 3(28): 604–613. https://doi.org/10.46234/ccdcw2021.160
Gull A, Lone AA, Islam UL and Wani N, 2019. Biotic and abiotic stresses in plants. In: de Oliveira AO (Ed) Abiotic and Biotic Stress in Plants, IntechOpen, London, 1-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.85832
Kumar R, Das SP, Choudhury BU, Kumar A, Prakash N R, Verma R, Chakraborti M, Devi AG, Bhattacharjee B, Das R, Das B, Devi HL, Das B, Rawat S and Mishra VK, 2024. Advances in genomic tools for plant breeding: Harnessing DNA molecular markers, genomic selection, and genome editing. Biological Research, 57: 80. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40659-024-00562-6
Lema M, 2018. Marker assisted selection in comparison to conventional plant breeding: Review article. Agricultural Research and Technology, 14(2): 555914. https://doi.org/10.19080/ARTOAJ.2018.14.555914
Perez-de-Castro A, Vilanova S, Canizares J, Pascual LM, Blanca J, Diez M, Prohens J and Pico B, 2012. Application of genomic tools in plant breeding. Current Genomics, 13(3): 179–195. https://doi.org/10.2174/138920212800543084
Razzaq MK, Akhte, M, Ahmad RM, Cheema KL, Hina A., Karikari B, Raza G, Xing G, Gai J and Khurshid M, 2022. CRISPR-Cas9 based stress tolerance: New hope for abiotic stress tolerance in chickpea (Cicer arietinum). Molecular Biology Reports, 49(9): 8977–8985. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-022-07391-4
Riaz A, Kanwal F, Börner A, Pillen K, Dai F and Alqudah AM, 2021. Advances in genomics-based breeding of barley: Molecular tools and genomic databases. Agronomy, 11(5): 894. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11050894
Robertsen CD, Hjortshøj RL and Janss LL, 2019. Genomic selection in cereal breeding. Agronomy, 9(2): 95. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9020095
Sato H, Mizoi J, Shinozaki K and Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, 2024. Complex plant responses to drought and heat stress under climate change. The Plant Journal, 117(6): 1873–1892. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.16612
Shakoor N, Lee S and Mockler TC, 2017. High throughput phenotyping to accelerate crop breeding and monitoring of diseases in the field. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 38: 184-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2017.05.006
Younis A, Ramzan F, Ramzan Y, Zulfiqar F, Ahsan M and Lim KB, 2020. Molecular markers improve abiotic stress tolerance in crops: A review. Plants, 9(10): 374. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9101374
How to cite
Hasan N and Rahim A 2025. Climate-resilient crops: Integration of molecular tools into conventional breeding. Journal of Bioscience and Environment Research, 2(2): 1-3. https://doi.org/10.69517/jber.2025.02.02.0001