The Genesis Publishing Consortium Limited (GPCL) is dedicated to advancing biological knowledge through high-quality, peer-reviewed research. The editorial recruitment policy and regulations outlined in this document serve as a foundational guide for the recruitment, appointment, and management of editorial board members, underscoring GPCL‘s commitment to excellence and transparency in scholarly publishing.
This policy is designed to establish a clear and systematic approach to the selection of editorial board members, ensuring that GPCL maintains the highest standards of academic excellence, ethical conduct, and diversity within its editorial processes. By defining criteria, procedures, and expectations, this policy aims to uphold the credibility and impact of the journal.
The GPCL editorial board comprises the Editor-in-Chief, associate editors, and editorial board members. This hierarchical structure facilitates efficient manuscript handling while upholding the quality and integrity of the peer-review process. Collaboration, communication, and collective decision-making are fostered through this organizational design.
Prospective members must demonstrate a high level of expertise in biological research, evidenced by a strong scholarly record, active engagement in research communities, and a profound understanding of their respective fields.
A Ph.D. or equivalent in a field relevant to the journal’s scope is the minimum requirement. Exceptions may be considered for individuals with substantial practical experience and significant contributions to the field.
Expectations include a substantial and impactful publication record in reputable journals, ensuring a proven track record of delivering high-quality research.
Preference is given to candidates with a history of actively reviewing manuscripts for reputable journals, indicating their ability to provide constructive feedback and contribute to rigorous peer review.
GPCL is committed to promoting diversity and inclusion on its editorial board, encouraging representation from various backgrounds, including gender, ethnicity, geography, and research focus.
Prospective members must demonstrate a strong commitment to upholding ethical standards in research and publication, showcasing a thorough understanding of issues related to plagiarism, authorship, conflicts of interest, and data integrity.
Nominations may come from current editorial board members, researchers in the field, or through self-nomination, ensuring a diverse pool of candidates.
Nominees are required to submit a comprehensive application package, including a CV, a statement of interest, and letters of recommendation, providing essential insights into their qualifications and suitability for the editorial role.
The editorial board conducts an initial screening of nominations, assessing alignment with GPCL’s criteria through a careful review of qualifications and potential contributions.
The evaluation process considers expertise, academic credentials, publication record, reviewing experience, commitment to diversity, and ethical standards, serving as a benchmark for assessing suitability.
Shortlisted candidates may be interviewed by the Editor-in-Chief, associate editors, relevant editorial board members, and the head of publishing, ensuring a comprehensive evaluation of qualifications, vision, and alignment with GPCL‘s goals.
Interviews assess the candidate’s understanding of the journal’s scope, approach to ethical issues, and vision for GPCL‘s future, ensuring alignment with the journal’s mission and values.
The editorial board collectively deliberates on the final selection of new members, considering recommendations from the interview panel.
The Editor-in-Chief makes the final decision on new editorial board members, ensuring consistency with the journal’s overarching goals and standards.
Candidates are promptly notified of the decision, and successful applicants receive an official appointment letter, ensuring transparency and initiating the onboarding process.
New editorial board members undergo an orientation program, familiarizing them with GPCL‘s policies, processes, and expectations, and seamlessly integrating them into the editorial workflow.
Editorial board members are typically appointed for an initial term of one year, renewable upon mutual agreement, providing continuity with periodic reassessment.
Renewal depends on performance, contribution to the journal, adherence to ethical standards, and evolving GPCL needs, ensuring a dynamic and aligned editorial board.
An annual performance review assesses editorial board members’ contributions and effectiveness, considering factors such as review quality, involvement in decisions, responsiveness, and ethical adherence.
Manuscript review: Thorough and timely reviews, providing constructive feedback.
Editorial decision-making: Active involvement in decisions to maintain consistency with GPCL‘s standards.
Ethical oversight: Crucial role in upholding ethical standards and addressing issues such as plagiarism and conflicts of interest.
Engagement with authors: Encouraged to engage with authors to improve submission quality and foster collaboration.
Promotion of the journal: Expected to actively promote GPCL within professional networks, enhancing visibility and impact.
Formal complaints: Addressed through a structured grievance procedure for fair and impartial resolution.
Grievance committee: Comprising impartial editorial board members, investigates and resolves complaints confidentially.
Conflicts of interest resolution: Identification, management, and resolution of conflicts transparently to align with GPCL‘s best interests.
Definition: Predatory journals and publishers engage in deceptive practices, compromising scholarly publishing integrity.
Rationale: GPCL strictly opposes involvement with predatory entities to maintain ethical standards, with consequences, including removal from the editorial board.
Evaluation criteria: Assessment of affiliation, collaboration, or association with known predatory journals or publishers to determine potential conflicts.
Implications and consequences: Involvement with predatory entities may lead to removal, emphasizing the severity of such associations.
Regular review: The editorial recruitment policy undergoes regular reviews to ensure effectiveness and relevance, considering changes in scholarly publishing and emerging best practices.
Stakeholder feedback: Actively seeks feedback from editorial board members, authors, and readers during policy reviews, ensuring alignment with evolving academic community needs.
Do you have any question? Ask us
Genesis Publishing Consortium Limited (GPCL) is an Open Access publisher, with more than 7 online, peer-reviewed journals covering a wide range of academic disciplines.
