Volume: 01, Issue: 02, Page: 12-20

Isolation and identification of enteric bacteria from different water sources at Mymensingh city, Bangladesh and their antibiogram study

1 Department of Microbiology and Hygiene, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh-2202, Bangladesh

2 Department Interdisciplinary Institute for Food Security, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh-2202, Bangladesh

*Corresponding authors Email address: mfrkhan@bau.edu.bd(Mohammad Ferdousur Rahman Khan)

doi: https://doi.org/10.69517/jber.2024.01.02.0003

Share:

Received:
11 June 2024

Revised:
17 July 2024

Accepted:
23 September 2024

Published:
26 September 2024

Highlights

  • Investigated the presence of enteric pathogens (e.g., Salmonella , Shigella spp., E. coli, and Vibrio spp.) in different sources of water.
  • Primarily identified the pathogens were based on cultural, staining, biochemical tests.
  • Molecular characterization of isolated enteric pathogens through PCR and multiplex PCR technique.
  • To detect the drug resistant genes and virulence factors genes emphasizing public health concerns.
  • Antibiogram profiles study of isolated pathogens to select suitable antibiotics for therapeutic purpose to reduce the economic loss.

Abstract

The goal of the current study was to separate and characterize the enteric bacteria found in water samples taken from various Mymensingh municipal sources and places. A total of 40 water samples were examined. Through the use of polymerase chain reaction (PCR), biochemical testing, staining, and culturing enteric bacteria were isolated and identified. The antibiotic resistance phenotype was examined using the disk diffusion assay. Out of 40 isolates that tested positive for bacterial growth, 3 (7.5%) were identified as Salmonella spp., 6 (15%) as Shigella spp., 14 (35%) as E. coli, and 3 (7.5%) as Vibrio spp. Molecular detection of Salmonella spp. were confirmed by PCR-based detection of the bcfC gene, Shigella species by the invC gene, E. coli by the 16S rRNA gene, and Vibrio spp. by the groEL gene. Furthermore, PCR-confirmed isolates were tested for antibiotic resistance to 12 routinely used antibiotics. All Salmonella isolates were 100% resistant to Amoxicillin but 100% sensitive to Azithromycin. However, varied sensitivity was seen against Cefepime (80%), Gentamycin (80%), Levofloxacin (75%), Cotrimoxazole (74%), and Amikacin (70%). The isolates also showed resistance to Ceftazidime (70%), as well as Ceftriaxone (33%). Shigella spp. isolates showed increased resistance to Cefepime (83%) and Ceftazidime (67%).  Additionally, resistance to Amoxicillin (17%) and Colistin (10%) was shown to be lower. In addition, Azithromycin, Levofloxacin, Cotrimoxazole, Ceftriaxone, Amikacin, and Gentamicin showed nearly no resistance or significant susceptibility E. coli isolates showed stronger resistance patterns to amoxicillin (100%), and colistin (93%). Cefepime (72%), Cotrimoxazole (72%), and Azithromycin (72%). The lower levels of resistance to ceftriaxone, amikacin, ceftazidime, levofloxacin, and gentamicin were also seen. The higher resistance patterns were shown by the isolated Vibrio spp. against Ampicillin (100%), Cefepime (81%), Cefixime (72%), Amoxicillin (70%), Erythromycin (67%), and Ceftazidime (67%). On the other hand, isolates with high and moderate sensitivity were found to be gentamicin, levofloxacin, doxycycline, cotrimoxazole, and amikacin. The study’s conclusions point to recent and ongoing contamination of the water sources, putting residents who depend on the water for drinking at risk for gastrointestinal illnesses.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Enteric bacteria, PCR, Antibiotic resistance, Sensitivity, Gastrointestinal

1. Introduction

Life depends on water. Water supply has been essential to society for many uses, including drinking, agriculture, industry, domestic use, and more, from the beginning of human civilization. The lack of access to clean drinking water is a major cause of health issues in poor nations (Hasan et al., 2019 popup link icon; Bylund et al., 2017 popup link icon; Thayer et al., 2012 popup link icon). Health and disease are significantly impacted by water, sanitation, and hygiene. Without a question, access to clean water is essential for survival and cannot be achieved without it (Hutton and Chase, 2016 popup link icon).
Several water sources in developing nations are dangerous due to the presence of dangerous chemical, biological, and physical contaminants (Cheesbrough, 1985 popup link icon). Infectious disorders that are spread by water are known as waterborne diseases because the pathogen or causal organism is present in the water and is consumed (Hurst, 2018 popup link icon).
Water-borne infections, including diarrhea and gastrointestinal disorders, have been the source of many outbreaks. These illnesses are caused by various bacteria, viruses, and protozoa (Kristanti et al., 2022 popup link icon).
The traditional waterborne enteric pathogens are Shigella spp. (four species causing dysentery), Salmonella enterica (subsp. enterica ser. Typhi, causing typhoid), and Vibrio cholerae (sero-groups O1 and O139, causing cholera). These pathogens have been largely controlled by water treatment/disinfection, and as a result, they are rarely a problem via drinking water in developed regions. However, Shigella sonnei, along with closely related shiga toxin and verotoxin-producing E. coli persist in the sewage of developed nations due to person-to-person and foodborne transmission (Ashbolt et al., 2015 popup link icon).
A genus of rod-shaped, gram-negative, non-spore-forming enterobacteria, mostly motile, is called salmonella. They are facultative anaerobes and chemo organotrophs, deriving their energy from organic substances through oxidation and reduction reactions. Growing most species on media containing ferrous sulfate allows one to easily detect hydrogen sulfide that they create. There are two phases that most isolates go through: a motile phase (I) and a non-motile phase (II). It is possible to transition non-motile cultures into the motile phase after primary culture. Closely linked to the Escherichia genus, salmonella can be found in both warm- and cold-blooded animals, including humans, as well as in food-borne illnesses including typhoid fever and paratyphoid fever (Stella et al., 2018 popup link icon; Ryan and Ray, 2004 popup link icon).
Shigella are non-motile, facultative anaerobic, gram-negative rods that do not generate spores. Shigella's pathogenicity, physiology (inability to digest lactose or decarboxylate lysine), and serology set it apart from the closely related Escherichia coli bacterium. The most frequent cause of bacillary dysentery is Shigella. This illness is not the same as enterotoxigenic diarrhea caused by Escherichia coli, which results in excessive amounts of watery diarrhea. The genus contains four sero-groups: A with twelve serotypes of S. dysenteriae, B with six serotypes of S. flexneri, C with eighteen serotypes of S. boydii, and D with one serotype of S. sonnei (Strockbine et al., 2015 popup link icon).
Although E. coli is considered to be a more accurate indication of faecal pollution, it still has a number of drawbacks that should be taken into account before relying solely on the findings of E. coli testing for faecal contamination (Rana et al., 2024 popup link icon; Hossain et al., 2024 popup link icon; Li et al., 2021 popup link icon). It has even been demonstrated that E. coli can flourish in certain natural aquatic settings. The emergence of dangerous strains of Escherichia coli and their pervasiveness in sources of drinking water are concerning (Saima et al., 2021 popup link icon). There is little evidence to correlate serotype to pathogenicity, and there is no biochemical marker to distinguish pathogenic from non-pathogenic strains of E. coli (Rivas et al., 2015 popup link icon). E. coli strains that cause disease have been isolated from mountain streams, drinking water sources, and tap water. According to reports, one of the ways that pathogenic E. coli strains spread is by water contamination; this is the case for many outbreaks of the newly developing O157:H7 strain of enterohemorrhagic E. coli (Gebregziabher et al., 2024 popup link icon; Ashbolt, 2015 popup link icon; Hruday et al., 2003 popup link icon).
The water-borne pathogens EPEC, ETEC, EIEC, and EHEC are well-known. It has a relatively limited lifespan outside of the environment, and it might not be able to thrive if there are other faecal bacteria present. In water, E. Coli O157:H7 can enter a viable but non-culturable (VBNC) condition but cannot live for extended periods of time. (Gambushe et al ., 2022 popup link icon)
Vibrio are tiny, curved, Gram-negative rods that have a single polar flagellum. Facultative anaerobes with both respiratory and fermentative metabolisms are called vibrios (Rana et al., 2024 popup link icon). Sodium is an absolute need for most species and encourages growth in all. The structures known as fimbriae, or pili, found on Vibrio cholerae, Vibrio parahaemolyticus, and Vibrio vulnificus cells are composed of the protein TcpA. One of the main factors influencing in vivo colonization is TcpA production, which is co-regulated with the expression of the cholera toxin (Cabral, 2010 popup link icon).
The World Health Organization has identified antibiotic resistance in bacteria as one of the biggest risks to human health (WHO, 2014 popup link icon). Antibiotic-resistant bacteria are able to multiply due to the selection pressure that is created when antibiotics are overused or misused (Islam et al ., 2024 popup link icon; Woappi et al., 2016 popup link icon; Levy et al., 2005 popup link icon). The environmental contamination is thought to be the most effective method for both the selection of resistant populations and the transfer of resistance genes via mobile genetic elements (Larsson and Flach, 2022 popup link icon; Ahmad et al., 2021 popup link icon). This species may serve as an indicator of bacteria that spread antibiotic resistance in aquatic environments because of their great prevalence there and a variety of antibiotic-resistant mechanisms (Siri et al., 2023 popup link icon). It may serve as a storehouse for ARGs that can spread horizontally through genes to other dangerous bacteria (Tao et al., 2022 popup link icon).
The current study was conducted to look into the occurrence of enteric pathogens (such as E. coli, Salmonella spp., Shigella spp., and Vibrio spp.) in various sources of water. Molecular characterization of isolated enteric pathogens, including the discovery of drug-resistant and virulence factor genes. Finally, an antibiogram research was conducted to choose appropriate antibiotics for therapeutic purposes, hence reducing economic loss.


2. Materials and Methods

2.1 Ethical approval

No ethical approval is required for this study.

2.2 Study areas

The entire study was carried out in the Department of Microbiology and Hygiene, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh-2202, Bangladesh, from March 2021 to October 2022. The places pond water samples were collected from the different ponds inside of Mymensingh city where as river water samples were collected from the Brahmaputra which flow beside Mymensingh city (Figure 1).


fig1 12 0003
Figure 1. Map of the study area, where the whole study was conducted.

2.3 Sample collection and processing

A total of 40 water samples (pond water, tap water, tube-well water, and river water) were collected, among which were 10, 10, 10, and 10 samples from rivers, ponds, water taps, and tube-wells, respectively. Each type of sample was collected from five different places of Mymensingh city where 2 samples were collected from each of the five different locations (Table 1). All water samples of this study were carefully handled and kept in transport box and maintained the temperature at 40C and immediately after collection all samples transported to the department of microbiology and hygiene for bacterial analysis. Using sterile falcon tubes, the samples (100 ml each) were collected, and then they were carefully transferred to the proper sterile containers and brought to the laboratory for bacteriological investigation. The water that had been collected was centrifuged for 3 minutes at 10,000 rpm. Sediments were re-suspended in sterile PBS for culture, while supernatants were disposed of.


Table 1. Sample types, number of samples, and sampling location.


2.4 Isolation and identification of bacteria

After being re-suspended, the primary culture of the samples was inoculated with NB and incubated for an entire night at 37ºC. The enriched culture from nutrient broth was streaked on to selective agar media and incubated at 37ºC for 24 hours. To obtain pure cultures, a single colony that had surfaced on the selective media was streaked onto selective media. The standard procedure was followed when examining various samples culturally for bacteriological analysis (ICMSF, 1988 popup link icon). Based on colony morphology, Gram's staining reaction, and biochemical test, bacteria were identified. The pure culture was stained by Gram using the technique outlined by Cheesbrough (2006 popup link icon).


2.5 Molecular identification of Salmonella spp., Shigella spp., E. coli, and Vibrio spp. by PCR

Each isolate's pure bacterial colony was inoculated into NB and kept at 37°C for the overnight. Next, 1ml of cultured broth was centrifuged for 3 min at 12,000 rpm. The supernatant was disposed of and replaced with 200 µl of purified water. After that, the tube was placed in boiling water and left there for 20 min. It was then immediately placed on ice for a brief period of time roughly for 10 min and centrifuged for 10 min at 12,000 rpm. During PCR, the supernatant was collected and used as a DNA template. Master Mix for PCR 10 µl, 1 µl each of the forward and reverse primers, 4 µl of the DNA template, and 4 µl of nuclease-free water. The final final volume of PCR product was 20 µl. The primers were performed to amplify the DNA of bcfC, invC, 16S rRNA, and groEL genes of Salmonella spp., Shigella spp., E. coli, and Vibrio spp., respectively


Table 2. The sequence of primers for bacteria.


2.5.2 Thermal profile for the amplification of PCR

Table 3. The thermal profile of bcfC gene specific primer of Salmonella spp.


Table 4. The thermal profile for invC gene specific primer Shigella spp.


Table 5. Thermal profile for 16S rRNA gene specific primer of E. coli


Table 6. Thermal profile for groEL gene specific primer of Vibrio spp.


2.6 Antibiotic sensitivity testing

The antimicrobial susceptibility assay was detected using the disc diffusion method in accordance with the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute's (CLSI, 2016 popup link icon) guidance. The disc diffusion method was used to test antimicrobial drug susceptibility against 12 widely used antibiotics (Bauer et al., 1966 popup link icon). The following antibiotic discs were employed for Salmonella spp., Shigella spp., E. coli, and Vibrio spp.: Amoxycillin (AMX, 20 μg), Gentamicin (GEN, 10 μg), Amikacin (AK, 30 μg), Ceftriaxone (CTR, 30 μg), Ceftazidime (CAZ, 30 μg), Azithromycin (AZM, 15 μg), Levofloxacin (LE, 5 μg), Colistin (CL, 10 μg), Cefepime (CPM, 30 μg), Aztreonam (AT, 30 μg), Ampicillin (AMP, 10 μg), Erythromycin (E, 15 μg) Doxycycline (DO, 30 μg), Cefixime (CPM, 30 μg).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1 Cultural, staining, and biochemical characteristics
3.1.1 Bacterial growth on nutrient agar

The appearance of homogenous turbidity in the nutrient broth indicated the growth of bacteria. The appearance of various types of colony characteristics (large, circular, convex, greyish-white, smooth, and translucent) on nutrient agar media indicated the presence of mixed bacterial population. Then each type of colony was sub-cultured on different selective media for specific bacterial colony as well as to obtain pure culture of Salmonella spp., Shigella spp., E. coli, and Vibrio spp. (Figure 2).


fig2 12 0003
Figure 2. Growth of mixed bacterial population on nutrient agar plate.

3.1.2 Subculture of bacterial isolates on different media for obtaining pure isolates of Salmonella spp., Shigella spp., E. coli, and Vibrio spp.

Among the 40 samples, 3 isolates showed colony characteristics consistent with Salmonella spp. on various media such as SS, XLD, BGA, and MAC Agar. On Salmonella Shigella (SS) agar media, all six suspected Shigella isolates formed characteristic big, round, convex, and colorless colonies. All 14 probable E. coli isolates formed smooth, round, black or green colonies with a metallic sheen on EMB agar. Following primary culture, all probable Vibriospp. isolates (n=3) formed characteristic smooth, round, yellow or greenish colonies on TCBS media.
Under the microscope, all of the putative Salmonella, Shigella, E. coli, and Vibrio isolates appeared to be gram-negative, pink-colored, tiny rod-shaped bacteria organized singly or in pairs. Salmonella isolates that are culture positive and urease positive change color from yellow to purple-red extremely quickly after organisms are inoculated into test tubes. However, unfavorable reactions that occur slowly imply positive results for Salmonella spp. All of the suspected Salmonella isolates tested negative for urease. The positive Shigella isolates did not ferment dextrose, maltose, lactose, or sucrose in comparison to gas generation. The isolates were only mannitol-positive, indicating acid generation.
The suspected Shigella isolates tested positive for Methyl Red and the indole test. The suspected Shigella isolates produced a pink ring and tested negative for VP.
The positive isolates of E. coli and Vibrio spp. fermented dextrose, maltose, lactose, and sucrose, as well as produced acid and gas. All probable E. coliisolates were positive for the Methyl Red test. However, Vibrio spp. isolates were negative for the Methyl Red test. Both putative isolates were VP-positive (Figure 3).

fig3 12 0003
Figure 3. The Salmonella spp. produced a red-colored colony with a black center, smooth, and small round colonies on XLD agar (Figure 3A) and the production of translucent black, smooth, and black-centered colonies on SS agar (Figure 3B). Along with the Salmonella spp. produced a round, smooth, small, opaque colorless colonies on MacConkey agar (Figure 3C) and development of translucent pink, smooth, and small round colonies on Brilliant Green Agar (Figure 3D). The Shigella spp. are seen as large, circular, convex, and transparent colonies on the SS (Salmonella-Shigella) agar plate (Figure 3E). Smooth, spherical colonies on EMB agar that are colored green or black with a metallic sheen for E. coli (Figure 3F). Smooth, circular, yellow or greenish colonies on TCBS media after primary culture of Vibrio (Figure 3G). Particularly smooth, circular, and yellow (Figure 3H) or greenish (Figure 3I) colonies on TCBS media for Vibrio spp.


3.2 Molecular confirmation of suspected Salmonella spp., Shigella spp., E. coli, and Vibrio spp. isolates

DNA from all probable Salmonella isolates was used in the PCR assay. DNA from pure culture was extracted using the standard boiling procedure.Salmonella spp. were validated by amplification of the bcfC gene (993 bp). Finally, 3 isolates were identified as salmonella spp. (Figure 4 A). Among the 40 samples, 6 were positive for Shigella spp. using a genus-specific primer of the invC gene. The amplicon size of 875 bp was observed using the UV trans-illuminator (Figure 4 B). Of the 40 samples analyzed, 14 tested positive for E. coli using a primer specific to the 16S rRNA gene. The resulting amplicon, measuring 704 bp, was detected with a UV trans-illuminator (Figure 4C).
Out of the 10 isolates initially suspected to be Vibrio, 3 were confirmed as Vibrio species using genus-specific groEL primers, which yielded a positive band at 1117 bp (Figure 4D). Further analysis with multiplex PCR and species-specific groEL primers identified all three confirmed isolates as Vibrio cholerae, producing a positive band at 418 bp (Figure 4E). No isolates were identified as Vibrio parahaemolyticus, Vibrio alginolyticus, or Vibrio vulnificusthrough multiplex PCR.

[caption id="attachment_11658" align="aligncenter" width="684"]fig4 12 0003 Figure 4 A. Amplification of bcfC gene for Salmonella spp. (993bp), Lane 1: 100bp DNA ladder, Lane 2: Positive control, 3-5: Salmonella spp. Figure 4 B. PCR amplification of Shigella genus specific gene primer (875 bp) of Shigella spp. Lane 1: 100bp DNA Marker, Lane 1-4: Representative Shigella spp. isolates. Figure 4 C. PCR amplification of E. coli genus specific gene primer (16S rRNA) of E. coli. Lane 1: 100bp DNA Marker, Lane 2-4: Representative E. coli isolates. Figure 4 D. PCR amplification of groEL gene for specific detection of the genus Vibrio Lane 1: 100bp DNA Marker, Lane-2: Positive control. Lane-3: Negative control, Lane 4-6: Representative Vibrio isolates. Figure 4 E. Amplification of groEL gene for the specific detection of V. alginohyticus (301), V. parahaemolyticus (644), V. cholerae (418) and V. vulnificus (192).

3.3 Antibiotics sensitivity test of isolated Salmonella spp. Shigella spp., E. coli, and Vibrio spp.

Among the three Salmonella spp. isolates, all were resistant to Amoxicillin, 70% to Ceftazidime, 33% to Ceftriaxone, and 25% to Levofloxacin. They were sensitive or intermediately sensitive to Azithromycin, Colistin, Amikacin, and Gentamicin.
For the six Shigella spp. isolates, 83% were resistant to Cefepime and 67% to Ceftazidime. They showed high or intermediate sensitivity to Azithromycin, Amoxicillin, Ceftriaxone, Colistin, Amikacin, and Gentamicin.
All 14 E. coli isolates displayed resistance patterns with 100% resistance to Amoxicillin, 93% to Colistin, 72% to Azithromycin, Cotrimoxazole, and Cefepime, and 57% to Gentamicin. They reacted to ceftriaxone and amikacin with high or intermediate sensitivity. Among the three Vibrio spp. isolates, 100% were resistant to Ampicillin, 81% to Cefepime, 72% to Cefixime, 70% to Amoxicillin, and 67% to both Erythromycin and Ceftazidime. They had high or intermediate sensitivity to amikacin, gentamicin, levofloxacin, doxycycline, and cotrimoxazole.

Table 7. The percentages of antibiotics sensitivity and resistance patterns of Salmonella spp. (n=3) isolates against different antibiotic classes.


Table 8. The percentages of antibiotics sensitivity and resistance patterns of Shigella spp. (n=6) isolates against different antibiotic classes.


Table 9. The percentages of antibiotics sensitivity and resistance patterns of E. coli (n=14) isolates against different antibiotic classes.


Table 10. The percentages of antibiotics sensitivity and resistance patterns of Vibrio cholerae (n=3) isolates against different antibiotic classes.


4. Discussion

In the fields of industry, research, and medicine, the Enterobacteriaceae family of bacteria is one of the most significant (Ramírez-Castillo et al., 2015). Microorganisms play a significant role in maintaining the quality of water and have the potential to spread pathogenic bacteria, viruses, and parasites into drinking water (Cabral, 2010; Tebbutt, 1977). Microorganisms like Salmonella, Shigella, Escherichia coli, and Vibrio cholerae are among those that can make people sick when they consume polluted water (Cabral, 2010).
This study intended to examine the presence, cultural characteristics, biochemical test, molecular characteristics, and antibiotic susceptibility status of Salmonella spp., Shigella spp., E. coli, and Vibrio spp. strains isolated from different water sources of Mymensingh city in Bangladesh.

Table 11. The overall occurrence of Salmonella spp., Shigella spp., E. coli, and Vibrio spp. in river water, pond water, tap water, and tube-well water.


The Enterobacteriaceae family is crucial in medicine, industry, and research (Ramírez-Castillo et al., 2015 popup link icon). Microorganisms in water can transfer diseases, including bacteria, viruses, and parasites (Cabral, 2010 popup link icon; Tebbutt, 1977 popup link icon). Pathogens like Salmonella, Shigella, E. coli, and Vibrio cholerae can contaminate drinking water (Cabral, 2010 popup link icon).
This study focused on assessing the presence, characteristics, and antibiotic resistance of Salmonella, Shigella, E. coli, and Vibrio strains from different water sources in Mymensingh city, Bangladesh.
The occurrence of 7.5% of Salmonella spp. in water was comparatively lower than the previously conducted reports of 19.4% and 3.3% of S. enterica in pond and well water, respectively, by Gu et al. (2021 popup link icon), 0.89% by Momtaz et al. (2013 popup link icon), and 4% by Dekker et al. (2018 popup link icon). Similarly, the higher findings were reported in southern Georgia and northern Florida at 28.2% by Luo et al. (2015 popup link icon) and on the banks of the Zarqa River at 12.8% by Tarazi et al. (2021 popup link icon). These fluctuations could be brought on by changes in the seasonal and geographic conditions along the Zarqa River's banks. A total of 3 isolates from the water samples utilized in this investigation were recognized as Salmonella spp. based on cultural and biochemical traits. According to Mridha et al. (2020 popup link icon), the colony features of Salmonella spp. that were isolated in various media resembled those of Salmonella spp. Variations in the outcomes could be caused by genetic variables and the type of organisms residing there. The isolates of Salmonella spp. exhibited higher resistance patterns against Amoxicillin (100%), Ceftazidime (70%), and Cephalexin (67%). Furthermore, a lower level of resistance was noted against Levofloxacin (25%), Ceftriaxone (33%) and almost no resistance or highly susceptibility to Cefepime, Amikacin, Gentamicin, Azithromycin, Colistin. The previous studies reported the higher resistance patterns of Salmonella spp. against amoxicillin by Mian et al. (2020 popup link icon). These differences may be due to geographical and seasonal variations.
The occurrence of 15% of Shigella spp. in water samples was higher than the previously conducted report of 5.4% by Hsu et al. (2010 popup link icon). Similarly, the higher 27% by Saima et al. (2018 popup link icon). These discrepancies may arise from differences in sample numbers, methods employed throughout the process, and regional and seasonal distribution. Using drinking water samples from this study, 6 isolates were determined to be Shigella spp. based on cultural and biochemical traits. According to Makabanyane et al. (2015 popup link icon), the colony features of Shigella spp. isolated in various media mirror those of Shigella spp. The Shigella spp. isolates showed higher resistance patterns to ceftazidime (67%) and cefepime (83%). Furthermore, a lower level of resistance was noted against Amoxicillin (17%), Colistin (10%) and almost no resistance or highly susceptibility was show to Azithromycin, Levofloxacin, Cotrimoxazole, Ceftriaxone, Amikacin, and Gentamicin. According to Matloko et al. (2021 popup link icon), who reported that Shigella spp. had greater resistance patterns to cefuroxime (36.1%, 13/36), cefepime (30.6%, 11/36), cefuroxime, and aztreonam (27.8%, 10/36) than to the other antibiotics examined (susceptibilities of > 75%), etc.
The occurrence of 35% of E. coli in water samples was higher than previously conducted reports of 7.5 8% by Momtaz et al. (2013 popup link icon). Similarly, the higher findings found 60.3% by Thani et al. (2016 popup link icon) and 77.97% from Larut River were commensal strains, with phylogroup B1 (39.55%) and phylogroup A (38.42%) by Bong et al. (2022 popup link icon). Variations in sample numbers, methods types employed throughout the process, and regional and seasonal dispersion could all contribute to these discrepancies. Utilizing drinking water samples for this investigation, a total of 16 isolates were determined to be E. colibased on biochemical and cultural traits. According to Schaumburg et al . (2015 popup link icon) and Hossain et al. (2020 popup link icon), the colony properties of the isolated E. coli in various media reflect those of E. coli. The higher resistance patterns were shown by the E. coli isolates to Amoxicillin (100%), Colistin (93%), Azithromycin (72%), Cotrimoxazole (72%), Cefepime (72%), Ceftazidime (57%), and Gentamicin (57%). Furthermore, a lower level of resistance was noted against Levofloxacin (7%), Ceftriaxone (36%), Amikacin (29%). Prior research has documented the 49.21% of the Escherichia coli isolates were susceptible, 12.90% were intermediate, and 37.90% were resistant overall. Vancomycin (94.64%) and erythromycin (85.71%) both exhibited high resistance. There was also a significant level of susceptibility to ceftrioxine (89.29%), gentamicin (91.07%), and ciprofloxacin (94.64%). Adzitey et al. (2016) who reported that a comparatively greater proportion of the Escherichia coli isolates from the water sample (50%) showed intermediate resistance to amoxycillin/clavulanic acid. Variations may be due to differences in geography, seasonality, sample sizes, and methods.
The occurrence of 7.5% of Vibrio spp. in water samples was higher than previously conducted reports of 1.7% by Alam et al. (2014 popup link icon). Similarly, higher findings found 89% by Shanan et al. (2011 popup link icon), 35% by Ferdous et al. (2018 popup link icon). These differences could be the result of changes in sample numbers, methods utilized throughout the entire process, and regional and seasonal distribution. There were 3 distinct Vibrio spp. isolates found according to the cultural and biological traits of the drinking water samples that were utilized for this investigation. Another study conducted by Azwai et al. (2016 popup link icon) reported that the colony properties of isolated Vibrio spp. in various media are similar to those of Vibrio spp., and the higher resistance patterns against 100% Ampicillin, 81% Cefepime, 72% Cefixime, 70% Amoxicillin, 67% Erythromycin, and 67% Ceftazidime were shown by Vibrio spp. Conversely, the higher sensitive against Gentamicin, Levofloxacin, Doxyciline, Cotrimoxazole, Amikacin.

5. Conclusions

The present study was carried out to isolate and identify Salmonella spp., Shigella spp., E. coli and Vibrio spp. from water samples of Mymensingh city. In addition, their antibiotic resistance profile was also determined at the phenotypic and genotypic level. The water sources from various locations in Mymensingh municipality are contaminated with enteric bacteria, posing a significant public health risk to residents who rely on the water for drinking. The presence of bacterial species such as Salmonella, Shigella, E. coli, and Vibrio highlights the potential for gastrointestinal diseases. The antibiotic resistance profiles of these isolates raise further concern. High levels of resistance to commonly used antibiotics like amoxicillin and ceftazidime suggest that treatment of infections caused by these bacteria may be challenging, and the continued use of antibiotics could exacerbate antimicrobial resistance. However, the isolates showed varied sensitivity to other antibiotics, indicating potential therapeutic options for managing infections. In conclusion, the study underscores the need for urgent measures to improve water quality, implement proper sanitation practices, and develop antimicrobial stewardship programs to address both contamination and the growing issue of antibiotic resistance in the region.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Ministry of Science and Technology, Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh (Ref. No. 39.00.0000.009.14.019.21-745, 417-ES) for supporting by giving financial funds to facilitate the research work.

Data availability statement

The data generated from this study will be available on the valid request from the corresponding author.

Informed consent statement

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: Mohammad Ferdousur Rahman Khan; Data collection, study conduct, and manuscript write up: Dula chakraborty and Limon Biswas; Methodology preparation: Mahbubul Pratik Siddique and Najmun Nahar Popy; Formal analysis, data analysis, first draft develop, and result section interpretation: Mohammad Ferdousur Rahman Khan, Mahbubul Pratik Siddique, Dula chakraborty, and Shantono Acharjee; Figure preparation, formal analysis, reviewed, and revised the final version of the manuscript: Dula chakraborty, Limon Biswas, Shantono Acharjee, and Najmun Nahar Popy, and Mohammad Ferdousur Rahman Khan. All authors critically reviewed the manuscript and agreed to submit final version of the article.

References

Adzitey F, Ashiagbor CNK and Abu H, 2016. Prevalence and antibiotic susceptibility of Salmonella spp. from water sources in Tamale, Ghana. International Journal of One Health, 2(2): 24-28.

Ahmad I, Malak HA and Abulreesh HH, 2021. Environmental antimicrobial resistance and its drivers: A potential threat to public health. Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance, 27: 101-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgar.2021.08.001

Alam MT, Weppelmann TA, Weber CD, Johnson JA, Rashid MH, Birch CS and Ali A, 2014. Monitoring water sources for environmental reservoirs of toxigenic Vibrio cholerae O1, Haiti. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 20(3): 356. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2003.131293

Ashbolt NJ, 2015. Microbial contamination of drinking water and human health from community water systems. Current Environmental Health Reports, 2: 95-106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-014-0037-5

Azwai SM, Alfallani EA, Abolghait SK, Garbaj AM, Naas HT, Moawad AA and Eldaghayes IM, 2016. Isolation and molecular identification of Vibrio spp. by sequencing of 16S rDNA from seafood, meat and meat products in Libya. Open Veterinary Journal, 6: 36-43. https://doi.org/10.4314/ovj.v6i1.6

Bauer AW, Kirby WMM, Shrris JC and Truck M, 1966. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 45(4): 493–496. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1571417124987473664

Bong CW, Low KY, Chai LC and Lee CW, 2022. Prevalence and diversity of antibiotic resistant Escherichia coli from anthropogenic-impacted Larut River. Frontiers in Public Health, 10: 794513. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.794513

Bylund J, Toljander J, Lysen M, Rasti N, Engqvist J and Simonsson M, 2017. Measuring sporadic gastrointestinal illness associated with drinking water–an overview of methodologies. Journal of Water and Health, 15: 321-34.   https://doi.org/10.2166/wh.2017.261

Cabral JP, 2010. Water microbiology. Bacterial pathogens and water. International Journal of Environmental research and Public Health, 7(10): 3657-3703. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph7103657

Cheesbrough M, 1985. Medical Laboratory Manual for Tropical Countries. 1st ed. English Language Book Society, London. pp. 400–480.

Cheesbrough M, 2006. District Laboratory Practice in Tropical Countries. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), 2016. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; Twenty-sixth informational supplement. CLSI document M100-S26. Wayne State University Press, Detroit, MI, USA.

Dekker D, Krumkamp R, Eibach D, Sarpong N, Boahen KG, Frimpong M and May J, 2018. Characterization of Salmonella enterica from invasive bloodstream infections and water sources in rural Ghana. BMC Infectious Diseases, 18: 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-018-2957-4

Farmer JJ and Hickman-Brenner FW, 2006. The Genera Vibrio and Photobacterium. In: Dworkin M, Falkow S, Rosenberg E, Schleifer KH, Stackebrandt E (eds) The Prokaryotes. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-30746-X_18

Ferdous J, Sultana R, Rashid RB, Tasnimuzzaman M, Nordland A, Begum A and Jensen PK, 2018. A comparative analysis of Vibrio cholerae contamination in point-of-drinking and source water in a low-income urban community, Bangladesh. Frontiers in Microbiology, 9: 489. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00489

Gebregziabher SM, Yalew AW, Sime H and Abera A, 2024. Molecular detection of waterborne pathogens in infants’ drinking water and their relationship with water quality determinants in eastern Ethiopia: loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP)-based study. Journal of Water and Health, 22: 1-20. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10111391

Gu G, Strawn LK, Ottesen AR, Ramachandran P, Reed EA, Zheng J and Rideout SL, 2021. Correlation of Salmonella enterica and Listeria monocytogenesin irrigation water to environmental factors, fecal indicators, and bacterial communities. Frontiers in Microbiology, 11: 557289. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.557289

Hasan MK, Shahriar A and Jim KU, 2019. Water pollution in Bangladesh and its impact on public health. Heliyon, 5(8). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02145

Hossain MJ, Islam MS, Sobur MA, Zaman SB, Nahar A, Rahman M and Rahman MT, 2020. Exploring poultry farm environment for antibiotic resistant Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp., and Staphylococcus spp. having public health significance. Journal of the Bangladesh Agricultural University, 18(3): 615-622. https://doi.org/10.5455/JBAU.98074

Hossain MS, Jony MAH, Saha N, Islam B, Sobur KA, Mowdood S and Hossain KM, 2024. Antibiotic resistance genes detection in Escherichia coli isolated from raw meat in Rajshahi division of Bangladesh. American Journal of Microbiological Research, 12(4): 79-84. https://doi.org/10.12691/ajmr-12-4-1

Hossain MT, Kim YR and Kong IS, 2014. PCR–restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis using groEL gene to differentiate pathogenic Vibrio species. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, 78: 9-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2013.10.005

Hsu BM, Wu SF, Huang SW, Tseng YJ, Ji DD, Chen JS and Shih FC, 2010. Differentiation and identification of Shigella spp. and enteroinvasive Escherichia coli in environmental waters by a molecular method and biochemical test. Water Research, 44(3): 949-955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2009.10.004

Hurst CJ, 2018. Understanding and estimating the risk of waterborne infectious disease associated with drinking water. The connections between ecology and infectious disease, 59-114. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92373-4_3

Hutton G and Chase C, 2016. The knowledge base for achieving the sustainable development goal targets on water supply, sanitation and hygiene. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13(6): 536. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13060536

ICMSF, 1998. Soft drinks, fruit juices, concentrates and fruit preserves. Micro-Organisms in Foods: Microbial Ecology of Food Commodities, Springer, Boston, MA. pp. 440-460. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5307-6_13

Islam MA, Bose P, Rahman MZ, Muktaruzzaman M, Sultana P, Ahamed T and Khatun MM, 2024. A review of antimicrobial usage practice in livestock and poultry production and its consequences on human and animal health. Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research, 11(3): 675–685. http://doi.org/10.5455/javar.2024.k817

Julqarnain SM, Bose P, Rahman MZ, Khatun MM and Islam MA, 2022. Bacteriological quality and prevalence of foodborne bacteria in broiler meat sold at live bird markets at Mymensingh city in Bangladesh. Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research, 9(3): 405. http://doi.org/10.5455/javar.2022.i608

Kristanti RA, Hadibarata T, Syafrudin M, Yılmaz M and Abdullah S, 2022. Microbiological contaminants in drinking water: Current status and challenges. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 233(8): 299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-022-05698-3

Larsson DG and Flach CF, 2022. Antibiotic resistance in the environment. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 20(5): 257-269. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-021-00649-x

Levy SB, O’Brien TF and Alliance for the Prudent Use of Antibiotics, 2005. Global antimicrobial resistance alerts and implications. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 41(Supp. 4): S219-S220. https://doi.org/10.1086/432443

Li E, Saleem F, Edge TA and Schellhorn HE, 2021. Biological indicators for fecal pollution detection and source tracking: A review. Processes, 9(11): 2058. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9112058

Luo Z, Gu G, Ginn A, Giurcanu MC, Adams P, Vellidis G and Wright AC, 2015. Distribution and characterization of Salmonella enterica isolates from irrigation ponds in the southeastern United States. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 81(13): 4376-4387. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.04086-14

Makabanyane N, Ndou RV and Ateba CN, 2015. Genotypic characterization of Shigella species isolated from abattoirs in the North West province, South Africa using PCR analysis. http://dx.doi.org/10.12691/jfnr-3-2-8

Matloko K, Fri J, Ateba TP, Molale-Tom LG and Ateba CN, 2021. Evidence of potentially unrelated AmpC beta-lactamase producing Enterobacteriaceae from cattle, cattle products and hospital environments commonly harboring the bla ACC resistance determinant. PLoS One, 16(7): e0253647. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253647

Mian AH, Fatima T, Qayyum S, Ali K, Shah R, Noorullah and Ali M, 2020. A study of bacterial profile and antibiotic susceptibility pattern found in drinking water at district Mansehra, Pakistan. Applied Nanoscience, 10: 5435-5439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13204-020-01411-0

Momtaz H, Dehkordi FS, Rahimi E and Asgarifar A, 2013. Detection of Escherichia coli, Salmonella species, and Vibrio cholerae in tap water and bottled drinking water in Isfahan, Iran. BMC Public Health, 13: 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-556

Mridha D, Uddin MN, Alam B, Akhter AT, Islam SS, Islam MS and Kabir SL, 2020. Identification and characterization of Salmonella spp. from samples of broiler farms in selected districts of Bangladesh. Veterinary World, 13(2): 275. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2020.275-283

Ojha SC, Yean Yean C, Ismail A and Singh BKK, 2013. A pentaplex PCR assay for the detection and differentiation of Shigella species. BioMed research international, 2013: 412370. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/412370

Ramírez-Castillo FY, Loera-Muro A, Jacques M, Garneau P, Avelar-González FJ, Harel J and Guerrero-Barrera AL, 2015. Waterborne pathogens: detection methods and challenges. Pathogens, 4(2): 307-334. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens4020307

Rana AH, Bose P, Sobur KA, Hossen MM, Mowdood S, Hossain MK, Afroz F, Rumi NA, Hasan M, Jahan N, Titas AR and Hosen MA, 2024. Molecular detection and antibiogram profiles of Escherichia coli and Vibrio cholerae isolated from raw vegetables in the northern district of Bangladesh. Journal of Bioscience and Environment Research, 1: 26-34. https://doi.org/10.69517/jber.2024.01.01.0006

Rivas L, Mellor GE, Gobius K and Fegan N, 2015. Detection and typing strategies for pathogenic Escherichia coli. Springer.

Ryan KJ and Ray CG, 2004. Sherris Medical Microbiology (4th edn) McGraw Hill, New York, pp. 294-295.

Saima AS, Ferhat Abbas R, Rizwan M, Yousaf M, Hassan Y, Naeem M and Saifullah S, 2018. Isolation & identification of Shigella species from food and water samples of Quetta, Pakistan. Pure and Applied Biology, 7: 227-235.

Saima U, Alam M and Akter S, 2021. Survival of Escherichia coli in water microcosm study and rethinking its use as indicator. Microbiology, 90(2): 247-260. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0026261721020107

Sarker MKD, Ahammed T, Sahabuddin M, Akter P, Haque A, Hossain MR, Mosaib MG, Islam MR, Mondol GC and Alam MF, 2019. Antibiotic resistance analysis of Vibrio spp. isolated from different types of water sources of Bangladesh and their characterization. European Journal of Medical and Health Sciences, 1(4): 19-29. https://doi.org/10.34104/ejmhs.01929

Shanan S, Abd H, Hedenström I, Saeed A and Sandström G, 2011. Detection of Vibrio cholerae and Acanthamoeba species from same natural water samples collected from different cholera endemic areas in Sudan. BMC Research Notes, 4: 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-4-109

Sharma B, 2018. Microbes as indicators of water quality and bioremediation of polluted waters: A novel approach. In: Microbial Biotechnology in Environmental Monitoring and Cleanup (pp. 44-60). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-3126-5.ch003

Siri Y, Precha N, Sirikanchana K, Haramoto E and Makkaew P, 2023. Antimicrobial resistance in Southeast Asian water environments: A systematic review of current evidence and future research directions. Science of The Total Environment, 896: 165229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165229

Stella EI, Ifeoma ME, Ochiabuto OMTB, Obi MC, Onwuasoanya UF and Obeagu EI, 2018: Evaluation of Salmonella Species in water sources in two local government areas of Anambra State. Cohesive Journal of Microbiology and Infectious Disease, 1: 1-9.

Strockbine NA, Bopp CA, Fields PI, Kaper JB and Nataro JP, 2015. Escherichia, Shigella, and Salmonella. In: Manual of Clinical Microbiology, 685-713. https://doi.org/10.1128/9781555817381.ch37

Tao S, Chen H, Li N, Wang T and Liang, W, 2022. The spread of antibiotic resistance genes in vivo model. Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology, 2022: 3348695. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3348695

Tarazi YH, Al Dwekat AF and Ismail ZB, 2021). Molecular characterization of Salmonella spp. isolates from river and dam water, irrigated vegetables, livestock, and poultry manures in Jordan. Veterinary World, 14(3): 813. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2021.813-819

Tebbutt THY, 1977. Principles of water quality control. 2nd ed. Pergamon Press, London.

Thani TS, Symekher SML, Boga H and Oundo J, 2016. Isolation and characterization of Escherichia colipatho types and factors associated with well and boreholes water contamination in Mombasa County. Pan African Medical Journal, 23:12. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2016.23.12.7755

Thayer KA, Heindel JJ, Bucher JR and Gallo MA, 2012. Role of environmental chemicals in diabetes and obesity: a National Toxicology Program workshop review. Environmental Health Perspectives, 120(6): 779-789. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1104597

Woappi Y, Gabani P, Singh A and Singh OV, 2016. Antibiotrophs: the complexity of antibiotic-subsisting and antibiotic-resistant microorganisms. Critical Reviews in Microbiology, 42: 17-30. https://doi.org/10.3109/1040841X.2013.875982

World Health Organization, 2014. Antimicrobial resistance: global report on surveillance. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/112642

Zhu C, Yue M, Rankin S, Weill FX, Frey J and Schifferli DM, 2015. One-step identification of five prominent chicken Salmonella serovars and biotypes. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 53(12): 3881-3883. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.01976-15

How to cite

Chakraborty D, Biswas L, Acharjee S, Popy NN, Siddique MP and Khan MMFR 2024. Isolation and identification of enteric bacteria from different water sources at Mymensingh city, Bangladesh and their antibiogram study. Journal of Bioscience and Environment Research, 1(2): 12-20. https://doi.org/10.69517/jber.2024.01.02.0003

CrossMark Update
CROSSMARK Color horizontal
Article Metrics

Table 11. The overall occurrence of Salmonella spp., Shigella spp., E. coli, and Vibrio spp. in river water, pond water, tap water, and tube-well water.


Sources of sample

No. tested of sample

Number of positiveSalmonella spp. n (%)

Numberof positiveE. coli n (%)

Numberof positiveShigella spp. n (%)

Numberof positiveVibrio spp. n (%)

 
 

River water

10

2 (20.00)

5 (50.00)

2 (20.00)

2 (20.00)

 

Pond water

10

1 (10.00)

6 (60.00)

3 (30.00)

1 (10.00)

 

Tap water

10

0 (0.0)

2 (20.00)

1 (10.00)

0 (0.00)

 

Tube well water

10

0 (0.0)

1 (10.00)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

 

Total

40

3

14

6

3

 

 

Table 10. The percentages of antibiotics sensitivity and resistance patterns of Vibrio cholerae (n=3) isolates against different antibiotic classes.

Antibiotic classes

Antibiotics

Sensitivity pattern of Vibrio spp.

Sensitive

Intermediate

Resistant

Beta-lactamase inhibitors

Amoxicillin (AMX)

30%

0%

70%

Ampicillin (AMP)

0%

0%

100%

 Macrolides

Erythromycin (E)

33%

0%

67%

Tetracycline

Doxyciline (DO)

67%

0%

33%

Quinolones

Levofloxacin (LE)

70%

0%

30%

Sulfonamides

Cotrimoxazole (COT)

68%

0%

32%

Cephalosporin

Cefixime (CFM)

28%

0%

72%

Ceftazidime (CAZ)

30%

3%

67%

Cefepime (CPM)

6%

13%

81%

Aminoglycosids

Amikacin (AK)

70%

0%

30%

Gentamicin (GEN)

93%

0%

7%

The display of 11 distinct antibiotics categorized into 7 classes, along with the sensitivity and resistance profiles of Vibrio cholerae isolates from water sources where Amoxicillin (AMX), Ampicillin (AMP), Erythromycin (E), Levofloxacin (LE), Doxycycline (DO), Cotrimoxazole (COT), Cefixime (CFM), Ceftazidime (CAZ), Cefepime (CPM), Amikacin (AK), and Gentamicin (GEN) are displayed in a bar diagram.

Table 9. The percentages of antibiotics sensitivity and resistance patterns of E. coli (n=14) isolates against different antibiotic classes.

Antibiotic classes

Antibiotics

Sensitivity pattern of E. coli

Sensitive

Intermediate

Resistant

Beta-lactamase inhibitors

Amoxicillin (AMX)

0%

0%

100%

Macrolides

Azithromycin (AZM)

14%

14%

72%

Polymixins

Colistin (CL)

0%

7%

93%

Quinolones

Levofloxacin (LE)

21%

72%

7%

Sulfonamides

Cotrimoxazole (COT)

21%

7%

72%

Cephalosporin

Ceftriaxone (CTR)

64%

0%

36%

Ceftazidime (CAZ)

22%

21%

57%

Cefepime (CPM)

21%

7%

72%

Aminoglycosides

Amikacin (AK)

64%

7%

29%

Gentamicin (GEN)

22%

21%

57%

The sensitivity and resistance profiles of E. coli isolates from water sources were tested against 10 drugs from seven distinct classes where Amoxicillin (AMX), Azithromycin (AZM), Colistin (CT), Levofloxacin (LE), Cotrimoxazole (COT), Ceftriaxone (CTR), Ceftazidime (CAZ), Cefepime (CPM), Amikacin (AK), and Gentamicin (GEN).

Table 8. The percentages of antibiotics sensitivity and resistance patterns of Shigella spp.  (n=6) isolates against different antibiotic classes.

Antibiotic classes

Antibiotics

Sensitivity pattern of Shigella spp.

Sensitive

Intermediate

Resistant

Beta-lactamase inhibitors

Amoxicillin (AMX)

83%

0%

17%

Macrolides

Azithromycin (AZM)

100%

0%

0%

Polymixins

Colistin (CL)

67%

23%

10%

Quinolones

Levofloxacin (LE)

67%

33%

0%

Sulfonamides

Cotrimoxazole (COT)

55%

45%

0%

Cephalosporin

Ceftriaxone (CTR)

83%

17%

0%

Ceftazidime (CAZ)

16%

17%

67%

Cefepime (CPM)

0%

17%

83%

Aminoglycosides

Amikacin (AK)

58%

42%

0%

Gentamicin (GEN)

67%

33%

0%

The sensitivity and resistance profiles of Shigella spp. isolates from water sources were assessed against 10 antibiotics across 7 different classes where Amoxicillin (AMX), Azithromycin (AZM), Colistin (CT), Levofloxacin (LE), Cotrimoxazole (COT), Ceftriaxone (CTR), Ceftazidime (CAZ), Cefepime (CPM), Amikacin (AK), and Gentamicin (GEN).

Table 7. The percentages of antibiotics sensitivity and resistance patterns of Salmonella spp. (n=3) isolates against different antibiotic classes.

Antibiotic classes

Antibiotics

Sensitivity pattern of Salmonella spp.

Sensitive

Intermediate

Resistant

Beta-lactamase inhibitors

Amoxicillin (AMX)

0%

0%

100%

Macrolides

Azithromycin (AZM)

100%

0%

0%

Polymixins

Colistin (CL)

67%

33%

0%

Quinolones

Levofloxacin (LE)

75%

0%

25%

Sulfonamides

Cotrimoxazole (COT)

74%

26%

0%

Cephalosporin

Ceftriaxone (CTR)

67%

0%

33%

Ceftazidime (CAZ)

30%

0%

70%

Cefepime (CPM)

80%

20%

0%

Aminoglycosides

Amikacin (AK)

70%

30%

0%

Gentamicin (GEN)

80%

20%

0%

The sensitivity and resistance profiles of Salmonella spp. isolates from water sources were analyzed against 10 antibiotics from 7 different classes where Amoxicillin (AMX), Azithromycin (AZM), Colistin (CT), Levofloxacin (LE), Cotrimoxazole (COT), Ceftriaxone (CTR), Ceftazidime (CAZ), Cefepime (CPM), Amikacin (AK), and Gentamicin (GEN).

Table 6. Thermal profile for groEL gene specific primer of Vibrio spp.

Conditions

Temperature (0C)

Time

Cycle (s)

References

Initial denaturation

94

5 min

30

 

Hossain et al. (2014)

 

Denaturation

94

30 sec

Annealing

69

30 sec

Extension

72

30 sec

Final extension

72

7 min

Holding

4

Until use

 

Table 5. Thermal profile for 16S rRNA gene specific primer of E. coli

Conditions

Temperature (0C)

Time

Cycle (s)

References

Initial denaturation

95

5 min

30

Sarker et al. (2018)

Denaturation

94

40 sec

Annealing

56

30 sec

Extension

72

30 sec

Final extension

72

10 min

Holding

4

Until use

Table 4. The thermal profile for invC gene specific primer Shigella spp.

Conditions

Temperature (0C)

Time

Cycle (s)

References

Initial denaturation

95

5 min

30

 

 

Ojha et al.(2013)

 

Denaturation

94

30 sec

Annealing

56

45 sec

Extension

72

60 sec

Final extension

72

10 min

Holding

4

Until use

 

Table 3. The thermal profile of bcfC gene specific primer of Salmonella spp.

Conditions

Temperature (°C)

Time

Cycle (s)

References

Initial denaturation

94

2 min

30

 

 

Zhu et al. (2015)

 

 

 

Denaturation

94

20 sec

Annealing

57

45 sec

Extension

72

1 min

Final extension

72

10 min

Holding

4

Until use

 

Table 2. The sequence of primers for bacteria.

Target genes

Primer sequence (5’–3’)

Amplicon size (bp)

References

bcfC

F: GGG TGG GCG GAA AAC TAT TTC

993 bp

Zhu et al. (2015)

R: CGG CAC GGC GGA ATA GAG CAC

invC

F: TGCCCAGTTTCTTCATACGC

875 bp

Ojha et al. (2013)

R: GAAAGTAGCTCCCGAAATGC

16S rRNA

 

F: AATTGAAGAGTTTGATCATG

704 bp

 

Sarker et al. (2018)

R: CTCTACGCATTTCACCGCTAC

groEL           

F: TCCARAACATGGGCGCACAA

1117 bp

Hossain et al.

(2014)

R: ACGTTTTGYTCTTCGTTGTCRC

 ‘F’= forward; ‘R’= reverse

Table 1. Sample types, number of samples, and sampling location.

River water (n=10)

Pond water (n=10)

Tube-well water (n=10)

Tap water (n=10)

Shesmor ghat

Shesmor pond

Shesmor

Kewatkhali

Ladies’ hall ghat

Baitul Aman mosque pond

Railway

Ganginar par

Baisakhi chattor ghat

Railway colony pond

Durgabari road

Shesmor

Thanar ghat

Teacher’s Training College pond

BAU 1st gate

SR Hall, BAU

Kalibari ghat

Tinkona pond

Jabbar’s moor

SNA Hall, BAU

 

[stm-calc id="1576"]