Volume: 02, Issue: 01, Page: 19-25

ISSN: 3079-5346

The changing land pattern, environment, and livelihood conditions for flower cultivation in Godkhali, Jashore, Bangladesh

1Department of Environmental Science and Disaster Management, Gopalganj Science and Technology University, Gopalganj-8100, Bangladesh

2Department of Environmental Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh-2200, Bangladesh

3Department of Environmental Science, Gazipur Agricultural University, Gazipur-1706, Bangladesh

4Department of Agroforestry, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh-2200, Bangladesh

*Corresponding authors

Email address: rajib.esd@bsmrstu.edu.bd (Md. Rajib Hossain)

doi: https://doi.org/10.69517/jber.2025.02.01.0005

ISSN: 3079-5346

Share:

Received:
27 November 2024

Revised:
18 January 2025

Accepted:
14 February 2025

Published:
20 February 2025

Highlights

  • Changing land patterns impact flower cultivation in Godkhali, Jashore, Bangladesh.
  • Environmental factors like water scarcity affect flower productivity and livelihoods.
  • The study reveals socio-economic resilience challenges for local flower farmers.
  • Intensive flower farming affects soil fertility, water resources, and pesticide use, leading to environmental degradation.
  • Future research should focus on climate adaptation and sustainable farming practices.

Abstract

The rapid population growth in the Godkhali region has led to increased agricultural pressure, particularly in flower cultivation. This study examines the environmental impact of flower farming, land-use changes, and its implications for local livelihoods. Understanding these effects is crucial for promoting sustainable agricultural practices while balancing economic and environmental concerns. The research aims to assess the environmental consequences of flower cultivation in Godkhali, Jhikargachha. Specific objectives include analyzing its impact on soil properties, water resources, and pesticide use while evaluating the role of environmental awareness among local farmers. 300 small-scale flower growers were randomly selected from three unions; namely, Godkhali, Panisara, and Navaron. Data collection methods included structured field visits, and interviews using closed-ended questionnaires, observations, and checklists. Additionally, expert consultations and desk research supplemented primary data to provide a comprehensive analysis. The findings indicate that intensive flower cultivation affects soil fertility, water consumption, and pesticide application, leading to environmental degradation. Key agricultural processes such as land preparation, fertilization, irrigation, pest control, post-harvest handling, and transportation contribute to ecological changes. Moreover, limited awareness of sustainable farming practices among growers exacerbates environmental challenges. To mitigate the negative environmental effects of flower farming, increased awareness programs and capacity-building initiatives are necessary. Strengthening policies that enforce environmental standards and providing incentives for compliance with sustainability guidelines are recommended. Collaboration between government bodies, private sector stakeholders, and donors can facilitate the adoption of eco-friendly agricultural practices, ensuring long-term environmental and economic sustainability in the region. This study underscores the need for an enabling policy framework to promote sustainable flower farming while safeguarding the environment. The findings can inform policymakers, agricultural experts, and local farmers about effective strategies for balancing agricultural productivity with environmental conservation.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Changing land pattern, Flower cultivation, Climate change, Environment, Godkhali

1. Introduction

Land use and cropping patterns in Bangladesh, including Jashore, are undergoing significant transformations due to various factors such as advancements in agricultural technology, improved storage facilities, enhanced communication, better marketing and networking systems, and the introduction of high-yielding seed varieties (Rahman et al., 2021). Farmers continuously adapt their land use and cropping patterns to maximize economic returns, often opting for alternative crops such as flowers, which have emerged as a viable option within traditional agricultural practices (Islam et al., 2023). People cultivate flowers as an alternative, which has become a unique practice in traditional agricultural practices (Patel et al., 2020). To conduct this study, primary and secondary data will be needed, which will be collected through a questionnaire and field survey, and from different agencies (Singh and Singh 2017). However this was not sufficient to meet the market demands, so the commercial production of flowers and ornamental plants started in Bangladesh (Sumalatha et al., 2024). Initially, a good number of farmers in the Jashore, Jhenaidah, Chuadanga, Satkhira, and Kushtia districts started the production of flowers and ornamental plants on a commercial basis (Gezmu, 2013). Bangladesh is an extensively populated country with a limited land area. The national economy of the country depends on agriculture (Faust and Dole, 2021). Agro-agricultural land is gradually being converted to homesteads and other uses to meet the demand of vast and fast population growth (Likhach et al., 2020). Consequently, flower cultivation has emerged as an alternative, allowing farmers to sustain their livelihoods while adapting to changing environmental and economic conditions (Chowdhury et al., 2022). Bangladesh, as a densely populated country with limited arable land, faces mounting pressure to optimize land use (Rahman and Hossain, 2022). To meet the demand of a large population, to increase the economic returns of farm enterprises, farmers try their best to maximize their land use pattern and cropping pattern (Sharma and Rai, 2012). So, by analyzing land use change, we can learn about the land use and land change dynamics of crop production at decimal intervals in the last three decades in the study area. We can also know the livelihood conditions, which helps to understand why they converted to cultivating flowers instead of crops. We can also know the environmental condition of the area and how it changed. This research will help determine the current state of land pattern change as well as the current environmental and livelihood conditions. The objective of this project is to identify the changing land pattern in the study area (1991–2021), to identify the environmental effects of flower cultivation on the environment in the study area, and to know the livelihood condition of the study area. This study will help to understand the land use and land cover changes in the last four decades in Godkhali Jashore and understand how livelihood approaches change or improve in response to changing land patterns and climate. This study will help to understand the changes in land use and land cover in the last four decades in Godkhali Jashore. In addition, provides information about the climatic variability in flower production. This study helps to understand how livelihood approaches change or improve in response to changing land patterns and climate.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1 Ethical approval

No ethical approval is required for this study.

2.2 Study area and periods

The study was conducted in the Jhikargacha upazila of Jashore district, Bangladesh, between January and April 2023 (Figure 1).


jber.21.0005.fig1 Figure 1. Location of the study area.
2.3 Data collection techniques

The main methods used were consultations with experts, desk studies, field visits, and interviews with farmers. Secondary data was obtained from various websites, horticulture-related institutions, and publications. Some reports and standards were reviewed to help the researcher conclude, identify activities and actors involved in the supply chain of small-scale farmers, and establish environmental requirements that were used to carry out audits amongst smallholders. The study was carried out within 3 regions in the Godkhali region, Godkhali Union, Panisara Union, and Navaron Union. A total of 300 small-scale flower growers were randomly selected. Four main methods were used to collect data namely, field visits and interviews whereby this research used closed-ended questionnaires, observation, and a checklist as means of data collection instruments, consultations with experts and desk studies were also used to help this research to conclude. Analysis was done by using both qualitative and quantitative techniques. To achieve this MS Excel computer package was used


2.4 Field visits and interviews for data collection

To conduct this study, primary and secondary data will be needed. Primary data will be collected through a questionnaire survey and focus group discussion. Secondary data will be collected from different agencies (BBS, BMD, BARC, etc.). Satellite images are also needed to analyze the land use change. Landsat data will be used to map land use and land change. The Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) will also be calculated to determine the state of the vegetation.


2.5 Data collection

Data collection is a part and parcel of any type of project. Because data are the primary element of the study. There were several ways of collecting appropriate data. To fulfill the objective, set out for this study pertinent information and literature were collected from the two sources which are-


2.5.1 Primary data collection

Primary data from the study region had been collected using various approaches such as questionnaire survey and field inquiry to meet the specified objectives. The questionnaire survey was done by randomly selected households in the study area. A total of 300 flower cultivator farmers were selected in a random stratified method for data collection.


2.5.2 Secondary data collection

The secondary data are those which have been already collected by someone else and which have already been passed through the statistical process. Secondary information such as reports, and maps have been collected from various journals, books, Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS, 2022). Accordingly, the meteorological data, such as daily, monthly, and annual temperature and rainfall, will be collected from the Bangladesh Meteorology Department (BMD) Database for the period of 1989–2021. This data will then be analyzed to assess the magnitude and extent of climate change in the study area. A trend analysis will be carried out to see the pattern of change in climatic variables. Descriptive statistics (average maximum and minimum) will be used to analyze temperatures and rainfall for varying periods in the selected districts. For comparison between different districts, the average, arithmetic mean, and percentage will be calculated. The data was analyzed following the objectives of the proposed research work. The factors that contribute to the impact of flower cultivation on farmers' livelihoods are analyzed using a regression model.


2.6 Statistical analysis

Processing the data was done after collecting the data from the primary (field, interview, and personal observation) and secondary sources. After sorting out the data information was categorized and interpreted according to the objectives and analyses were done with the help of different analytical methods and computer programs MS Word and Excel-2021. The study area map was prepared using ArcGIS 10.5 software, utilizing Bangladesh’s administrative shape files. This software allows for efficient mapping and spatial analysis, ensuring accuracy in the representation of geographic data.


3. Results and Discussion

3.1 Changing land use pattern

Agriculture and non-agriculture land are two broad categories of land use with important social, economic, and environmental implications. Agriculture is the predominant use of land globally, with approximately 38% of the world's land surface used for crop and livestock production (Water, 2021). Agriculture is a major source of food, income, and employment for millions of people worldwide (Hemathilake and Gunathilake, 2022). Non-agriculture land includes a variety of land uses, such as urban areas, forests, wetlands, and water bodies (Patel et al., 2019). Non-agriculture land can also provide important recreational opportunities and contribute to the cultural and aesthetic values of a region. However, the conversion of non-agriculture land to other land uses, such as urbanization, can result in significant environmental impacts, such as habitat loss, fragmentation, and degradation (Guo, 2016; Yuan et al., 2005) (Figure 2). The changes in land use and land cover over time, showed how agricultural, non-agricultural, and other land categories have evolved due to factors like population growth, urbanization, and shifts in cultivation practices.  Land use and land cover (LULC) changes are influenced by agricultural expansion, urbanization, and socio-economic factors (Rahman et al., 2021). Similar studies have documented the decline of agricultural land due to urbanization and economic transitions (Patel et al., 2019; Yuan et al., 2005). Remote sensing and GIS-based assessments are commonly used to track LULC patterns over time (Kumar et al., 2017).


jber.21.0005.fig2 Figure 2. Land Use and Land Cover (LULC) of Godkhali Union from 1991 to 2021.

The study suggested that there had been a decline in the amount of land used for agriculture between 1991 and 2021, from 15.32% to 12.09%, respectively. On the other hand, the amount of non-agriculture land has increased from 5.85% in 1991 to 9.07% in 2021 (Table 1). Studies indicate a steady decline in agricultural land use due to commercialization and changing cropping patterns (Islam et al., 2023). Urban expansion and economic shifts often contribute to increased non-agricultural land use; a trend observed globally (Rahman and Hossain, 2022).


Table 1. Land use pattern of Godkhali Union 1991 to 2021.


In 1991, 15.32% of the land was used for agricultural purposes, while 5.85% was used for non-agricultural purposes. In 2006, the percentage of land used for agriculture decreased to 13.38%, while the percentage of non-agricultural land increased to 7.79%. However, in 2021, the percentage of land used for agriculture decreased again to 15.04%, while the percentage of non-agricultural land increased slightly to 6.12%. According to the table, the accuracy percentage was 84% in 1991, 88% in 2006, and 90% in 2021. This shift in land use patterns could be attributed to various factors, such as population growth, urbanization, and changing economic conditions (Singh and Nair, 2015). As populations grow and urban areas expand, there is increased pressure on agricultural land to be converted to non-agricultural uses such as urban development, infrastructure, and industrial activities (Kumar et al., 2017). Effective management of both agricultural and non-agriculture land is essential for sustainable development. Sustainable agriculture practices such as conservation agriculture, agroforestry, and integrated crop-livestock systems can help to reduce the negative impacts of agriculture on the environment while ensuring food security (Canton, 2021). Sustainable management of non-agriculture land requires a balance between economic development and environmental conservation through effective land use planning and management (Rao et al., 2016).


3.2 Socio-economic condition of the respondents

In terms of the socio-economic condition of the respondents, a total of 88.33% of males responded to the survey, whereas only 11.67% of females participated. The age range of respondents started from ≤20 and extended to ≥60. The highest number of respondents fell within the 31-40 age group, comprising 38.33% (115 out of 300). The second highest group was between 21-30 years, making up 21.67% (65 respondents). Nearly 18% of respondents belonged to the 41-50 age group, while 4% were between 51-60 years. Additionally, 15.67% were aged ≤20, and only 2.67% were aged ≥60. The education level of respondents was also examined. Most respondents had completed primary education, accounting for 31.67%. A small percentage had obtained higher degrees, with 3% holding a bachelor’s degree and 1.33% having a master’s degree. Almost 27% had secondary education, while 19% had completed higher secondary education. However, 18.33% of respondents were illiterate. Regarding occupation, 38.33% of respondents were involved in the flower business, while 61.67% worked as flower farmers. Among them, 71% were peasant farmers, while 29% were part-time farmers. More than half of the population (55%) lived in households with 3-5 family members. About 11% of respondents had large families with nine or more members, while 25% had 6-8 members. A small percentage (9.33%) lived in households with fewer than two members. In terms of earning members in the family, most households had one earning member (43%), while 42.3% had two earning members. Only 2% of families had four earning members, while 12.7% had three earning members. Regarding monthly household income, 37.67% of respondents earned between 25,001-35,000 BDT. Another 34% fell within the range of 15,001-25,000 BDT, while 18.67% earned between 5,001-15,000 BDT. A small percentage (4.66%) had an income exceeding 50,000 BDT, while 2.33% earned less than 5,000 BDT. Additionally, 2.67% of respondents reported a monthly income between 35,001-50,000 BDT. However, in the previous year, household incomes were reported to be better. No respondent had an income below 5,000 BDT. Among them, 38% earned between 25,001-35,000 BDT, while 35% fell within the 15,001-25,000 BDT range. A notable portion (11.33%) earned between 35,001-50,000 BDT, and around 12% of respondents reported earning more than 50,000 BDT per month in the last year (Table 2). Socioeconomic variables such as education, income, and land ownership significantly affect the sustainability of floriculture (Hemathilake and Gunathilake, 2022). Smallholder flower growers in Bangladesh face market volatility, requiring policy support for economic stability (Singh and Nair, 2015).


Table 2. Socio-economic condition of the respondents (N=300).


3.3 Effects of flower cultivation on the environment
3.3.1 Major flower cultivated by respondents

Many varieties of flowers are cultivated in the Godkhali region, which is helping this region grow economically. Floriculture has grown significantly in Bangladesh, with Jashore becoming a major hub for flower production (Faust and Dole, 2021). The economic importance of flower cultivation is rising, supporting smallholder farmers and local businesses (Chowdhury et al., 2022).


Table 3. Major flowers cultivated in the study area and their detailed information.


Rose and Gladiolus are the primary flowers cultivated in the area, with 46% of farmers growing them. Chrysanths and Gerbera are also popular, cultivated by 30% of farmers. Additionally, 16% of farmers grow Marigolds and Tuberose, while 8% cultivate other types of flowers (Figure 3).


jber.21.0005.fig3 Figure 3. Major flowers cultivated in the study area.
3.3.2 Average flower sale per day by local farmers

Many smallholder farmers sell flowers regularly, distributing them to various parts of the country. According to the survey, 9% of farmers earn less than 500 BDT daily from flower sales. About 39% earn between 500 and 1,000 BDT per day, while 35% earn between 1,000 and 1,500 BDT daily. Meanwhile, 17% of farmers reported earning more than 1,500 BDT per day from flower sales (Table 4).


Table 4. Average sales by farmers per day (N=300).


3.3.3 Degradation of soil fertility

Regarding soil fertility, 65% of farmers reported experiencing soil degradation due to fertilizer use, while 35% observed no signs of degradation (Figure 4). A yearly soil test for pH and nutrient levels should be conducted in either the fall or spring. Since phosphorus (P), potassium (K), calcium (Ca), and magnesium (Mg) are relatively stable in the soil, a fall test provides an accurate assessment of these elements for the following spring. If required, amendments like limestone or rock phosphate can be applied in the fall, allowing them sufficient time to react with the soil before the growing season. However, since nitrogen (N) levels fluctuate frequently, it is best to perform a soil test in the spring or just before nitrogen application to determine the optimal application rate (Rao et al., 2016). Some large and fast-growing annuals, such as sunflowers, may require additional nutrients, which can be supplied through side-dressing if necessary. Instead of using a balanced fertilizer like 10-10-10, growers can use single-element fertilizers such as ammonium nitrate for nitrogen, superphosphate for phosphorus, and potassium chloride for potassium to meet specific nutrient requirements based on soil test results. Studies highlight the need for sustainable farming techniques to maintain long-term soil health (Rao et al., 2016).


jber.21.0005.fig4 Figure 4. Degradation on soil fertility.
3.3.4 Use of fertilizers per month

Fertilizers such as compost, TSP, bone powder, M, P, urea, hail, tea-leaf residue, ash, etc. should be mixed and the soil should be cleaned. Organic fertilizers should be given priority in the application of fertilizers. In most cases, inorganic fertilizers are used to prepare the land.  Around 34% of farmers use fertilizer one time on their land and 9% use it three times. In general, fertilizer is applied to encourage shoot development when growth begins in the spring and 57% of the local farmers use fertilizer two times on their land every month (Figure 5). An approximate amount of limestone needs to change soil pH and to support the flowers as they develop. An additional application of fertilizer is needed to support preparations for winter.  Organic alternatives such as compost and bio-fertilizers could help mitigate excessive chemical use (Likhach et al., 2020).


jber.21.0005.fig5 Figure 5. Fertilizer used per month.
3.3.5 Organization’s name which held the awareness program

Around 55% of the awareness program is held by NGOs. The government also arranges 35% of them. Some international organizations also come here to create environmental awareness among local people about 10% of the programs held by international organizations (Figure 6). Environmental awareness programs by NGOs and government agencies play a crucial role in promoting sustainable floriculture (Gezmu, 2013). Community-based initiatives help in reducing environmental degradation through knowledge-sharing (Patel et al., 2020).


jber.21.0005.fig6 Figure 6. The Organization held an awareness program.
3.4 Farmer’s experience in flower cultivation

A total of 300 people were interviewed for the survey. Among them, 30% have been working for 6-10 years, 23% for 11-15 years, and 17% for 16-20 years. A smaller group, only 5%, have been working for more than 21 years. The experience of farmers in flower cultivation is closely related to their ability to adapt to changing agricultural practices and market conditions (Chowdhury et al., 2022). On average, people have been working in flower cultivation for 16-20 years (Figure 7).


3.5 Sources of irrigation water for flower cultivation

There are four main sources of irrigation for flower cultivation. Among them, shallow tube wells are the most used, with 39% of farmers (117 out of 300) relying on this source. Pond water is the second most common, used by 31% of farmers (93 individuals). Deep tube wells are utilized by 25% of respondents (75 farmers). Studies emphasize the importance of efficient irrigation methods, particularly in water-scarce regions, to ensure consistent crop yields (Singh and Singh, 2017). The least used source is river water, with only 5% of farmers depending on it for flower irrigation (Figure 8).


jber.21.0005.fig7 Figure 7. Experience time of farmer for flower cultivation. jber.21.0005.fig8 Figure 8. Irrigation water sources for flower cultivation.
3.6 Production of flowers

Most respondents (25%) reported having good to very good flower production among the 300 surveyed. Additionally, 16% indicated excellent flower production. However, 6% of farmers experienced poor flower production, while 7% reported very poor production. Flower production outcomes are highly dependent on environmental conditions, including soil quality, water availability, and pest control (Faust and Dole, 2021). Previous research indicates that climate variability can lead to significant fluctuations in flower production, affecting farmers' income (Gezmu, 2013). Furthermore, 21% of the farmers in the study area described their flower production as moderate (Figure 9).


jber.21.0005.fig9 Figure 9. Production condition of flower cultivation in the study area.
3.7 Road conditions to transport products

In the study area, 16% of respondents reported that the roads are in good condition for transportation. Meanwhile, 41% described the roads as being in moderate condition. Transportation infrastructure plays a critical role in the economic viability of flower farming by ensuring timely delivery to markets (Patel et al., 2020). However, 43% of respondents indicated that the roads are in very good condition (Figure 10).


jber.21.0005.fig10 Figure 10. The situation of road condition to transport products.
3.8 The housing situation of the respondents

In the study area, the majority of people (45.67%) live in half-built houses. A smaller proportion, 11.33% (34 out of 300), reside in tin-shed houses. Housing quality is often linked to socio-economic conditions and access to resources, including stable income from agriculture (Kumar et al., 2017). In rural areas, housing conditions are frequently influenced by agricultural productivity and local economic stability (Patel et al., 2020). Additionally, 43% of the population (129 out of 300) live in fully constructed buildings (Figure 11).


jber.21.0005.fig11 Figure 11. Respondent’s housing condition in the study area
3.9 Respondent’s participation in government/voluntary work

Various individuals participated in government or voluntary work. Among the studied population, 28.33% consistently participated in these activities, while 15% participated often. Voluntary engagement in community initiatives is often higher in areas with strong agricultural economies, as it fosters social networks and collective action (Singh and Nair, 2015). Community-based activities can enhance the resilience of farming communities by improving access to information, resources, and markets (Chowdhury et al., 2022). Additionally, around 25% of people participated moderately, and 32% participated to a lesser extent (Figure 12).


jber.21.0005.fig12 Figure 12. Respondents’ participation in voluntary work.
3.10 Respondent’s health condition

Most respondents (41% or 122 individuals) reported having a good health condition. Additionally, 18% indicated very good health. Another researcher indicates that agricultural laborers face higher health risks, often exacerbated by inadequate healthcare infrastructure in rural areas (Faust and Dole, 2021). In contrast, 18% (55 individuals) often suffer from various illnesses, while 23% (68 individuals) described their health status as moderate (Figure 13).


jber.21.0005.fig13 Figure 13. Health condition of the survey respondents.

4. Conclusions

The present study highlights the significant changes in land patterns, environmental conditions, and livelihood outcomes for flower cultivation in Godkhali, Jashore. Flowers are popular in ceremonies, easy to obtain, and affordable, with a small quantity sufficient for decoration. Cultivating flowers on rooftops is also feasible with minimal labor required. Key findings suggest that shifting agricultural practices and environmental changes, such as water scarcity and soil degradation, have impacted flower productivity and farmers' livelihoods. Despite valuable insights, a major research gap remains in understanding the long-term effects of climate change on crop yield and the socio-economic resilience of farmers. Future studies should focus on climate adaptation strategies, sustainable farming practices, and the development of policy frameworks that can help mitigate environmental risks. Expanding the scope of research on this subject will provide comprehensive solutions for the sustainability of flower cultivation in the region.

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the flower cultivator in the study area of Godkhali Jashore, Bangladesh.

Data availability

Data will be available upon request from the corresponding author.

Informed consent statement

No informed consent was required to conduct the study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding information

This study was financially supported by Gopalganj Science and Technology University (Former BSMRSTU), Gopalganj, Bangladesh under the 2021-22 research project funding scheme. The authors sincerely appreciate the university's support in conducting this study.

Authors’ contribution

Conceptualization, methodology, data curation, formal analysis, writing original draft, supervision: Md. Rajib Hossain; Supervision, project administration, writing review, and editing: Md. Shamsur Rahman; Data collection, validation, visualization, review, and editing: Md. Aminul Islam; Investigation, software, validation, and map creation: Rifat Islam; Data collection, resources, and review: Md. Mirhazul Islam. All authors critically reviewed the manuscript and agreed to submit the final version of the article.

References

BBS, 2022. Statistical Yearbook of Bangladesh. Ministry of Planning, Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh. Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Canton H, 2021. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations—FAO. The Europa Directory of International Organizations 2021 (pp. 297-305). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003179900-41

Chowdhury R, Alam MK and Sarker MH, 2022. Floriculture and climate adaptation: Understanding farmers’ responses to environmental change in Bangladesh. Asian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 15(2): 115-130.

Faust JE and Dole JM, 2021. The global cut flower and foliage marketplace. Cut Flowers and Foliages, 27: 1-47. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781789247602.0001

Gezmu AB, 2013. The human impacts of flower farm development in the Ethiopian Rift Valley region. PhD thesis, Department of Food, Business and Development, University College Cork, Ireland. pp. 277.

Guo X, 2016. The interaction effect of soil organisms and plant intraspecific diversity on ecosystem functions. PhD thesis, Department of Biology, Chemistry and Pharmacy, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany. pp. 132. http://doi.org/10.17169/refubium-15121

Hemathilake D and Gunathilake D, 2022. Agricultural productivity and food supply to meet increased demands. Future Foods (pp. 539-553). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-91001-9.00016-5

Islam MR, Akter S and Rahman T, 2023. Economic viability of floriculture in Bangladesh: A case study on Jashore district. Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Economics, 40: 32-50.

Kremen C and Miles A, 2012. Ecosystem services in biologically diversified versus conventional farming systems: Benefits, externalities, and trade-offs. Ecology and Society, 17(4): 40. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05035-170440

Kumar P, Singh D and John S, 2017. Multi-criteria decision support system for sustainable municipal solid waste management: A case study of Chandigarh, India. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4906554

Likhach V, Likhach A, Duczmal M, Janicki M, Ohienko M, Obozna A and Faustov R, 2020. Management of innovative technologies and creation of bio-products. The Academy of Management and Administration in Opole, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine. Publishing House WSZiA. pp. 224.

Patel SK, Sharma A and Singh GS, 2020. Traditional agricultural practices in India: An approach for environmental sustainability and food security. Energy, Ecology and Environment, 5(4): 253-271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40974-020-00158-2

Patel SK, Verma P and Singh GS, 2019. Agricultural growth and land use land cover change in peri-urban India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 191: 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7736-1

Rahman MA, Hasan MM and Sultana S, 2021. Changing patterns of land use and cropping in Bangladesh: Drivers and impacts. Journal of Agricultural Research and Development, 5(2): 45-58.

Rahman MS and Hossain MA, 2022. Land use transformation and its impact on rural livelihoods in Bangladesh. Journal of Land Use Policy and Development, 18(2): 65-80.

Rao M, Babu VS, Chandra KS and Chary GR, 2016. Integrated land use planning for sustainable agriculture and rural development. Apple Academic Press. pp. 382. https://doi.org/10.1201/b18816

Reijntjes C, Haverkort B and Waters-Bayer A, 1992. Farming for the Future. Macmillan Educ.

Sharma G and Rai LK, 2012. Climate change and sustainability of agrodiversity in traditional farming of the Sikkim Himalaya. Climate Change in Sikkim: Patterns, Impacts, Initiatives, 1: 193-218.

Singh PK and Nair A, 2015. Status of land conflicts in India. Institute of Rural Management Gujarat, India. pp. 105.

Singh R and Singh G, 2017. Traditional agriculture: A climate-smart approach for sustainable food production. Energy, Ecology and Environment, 2: 296-316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40974-017-0074-7

Sumalatha A, Momin KC and Bhargav V, 2024. Ornamental horticulture and landscape gardening: An overview and introduction. In: Bhargava B, Kumar P, Verma V (Eds.), Ornamental Horticulture: Latest Cultivation Practices and Breeding Technologies (pp. 1-14). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-4028-4_1

Water U, 2021. Progress on change in water-use efficiency: Global status and acceleration needs for SDG indicator 6.4.1, 2021. Food and Agriculture Organization. pp. 90.

Yuan F, Sawaya KE, Loeffelholz BC and Bauer ME, 2005. Land cover classification and change analysis of the Twin Cities (Minnesota) Metropolitan Area by multitemporal Landsat remote sensing. Remote Sensing of Environment, 98(2-3): 317-328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2005.08.006

How to cite

Hossain MR, Rahman MS, Islam MA, Islam R and Islam MM, 2025. The changing land pattern, environment, and livelihood conditions for flower cultivation in Godkhali, Jashore, Bangladesh. Journal of Bioscience and Environment Research, 2(1): 19-25. https://doi.org/10.69517/jber.2025.02.01.0005

CrossMark Update
CROSSMARK Color horizontal
Article Metrics

Table 4. Average sales by farmers per day (N=300).

Average sale/day (BDT)

Frequency

Percentage

>500

27

9

500-1000

117

39

1000-1500

105

35

<1500

51

17

 

Table 3. Major flowers cultivated in the study area and their detailed information.

Name of flowers

Imported from

Scientific name

Family

Origin

Marigold

Rangpur

Tagetes erecta

Asteraceae

Mexico

Tuberose

Jashore

Polithanthes tuberose

Asparagusate

Mexico

Rose

Jashore

Rosa centifolia

Rosaceae

Dutch

Gladiolus

Jashore

Gladiolus italics

Iridaceae

Africa

Chinese Bela

Jashore

Platycodon grandiose

Campanulaceae

China

Chrysanths

Locally cultivated

Chrysanthemum indicum

Asteraceae

Asia, Europe

Water Lily

Locally cultivated

Victoria amazonica

Nymphaeaceae

Europe

Gerbera

Jashore

Gerbera hybrida

Asteraceae

Asia, America

 

Table 2. Socio-economic condition of the respondents (N=300).

Characteristics

Unit

Total respondents

Percentage

Mean

SD

Gender

Male

265

88.33

 

50

 

54.206

Female

35

11.67

Age

≤20

47

15.67

 

 

16.667

 

 

13.059

21-30

65

21.67

31-40

115

38.33

41-50

53

17.66

51-60

12

4

≥60

8

2.67

 

 

   Education

Illiterate

55

18.33

 

 

 

16.667

 

 

 

 

12.291

 

Primary

95

31.67

Secondary

80

26.67

Higher secondary

57

19

Bachelor

9

3

Master’s

4

1.33

 

Occupation

Flower business

115

38.33

 

 

50

 

 

16.504

Flower farmer

185

61.67

Type of farmers

Peasant household

213

213

 

 

150

 

 

89.095

Part-time farmer

87

87

 

 

Family members

≤ 2

28

28

 

 

75

 

 

63.660

5

165

165

8

75

75

≥ 9

32

32

 

 

Earning members

1

129

129

 

 

75

 

 

62.583

2

127

127

3

38

38

4

6

6

 

 

 

Monthly household income

≤5000

7

7

 

 

 

50

 

 

 

48.203

5,001-15,000

56

56

15,001-25,000

102

102

25,001-35,000

113

113

35,001-5,0000

8

8

≥50,000

14

14

Monthly household income in the last year

≤5000

0

0

 

 

50

 

 

 

 

48.054

 

 

5,001-15,000

12

12

15,001-25,000

105

105

25,001-35,000

114

114

35,001-5,0000

34

34

≥50,000

35

35

*(C.F.= Cumulative frequency) (SD= Standard deviation)

 

Table 1. Land use pattern of Godkhali Union 1991 to 2021.

Land use pattern

1991

2006

2021

Agriculture land (%)

15.32

13.38

12.09

Non-agriculture land (%)

5.85

7.79

9.07

Accuracy (%)

84

88

90

 

[stm-calc id="1576"]