Outline
Figures

Volume: 02, Issue: 04, Page: 1-3

ISSN: 3079-5346

Advances in DNA replication research for precision medicine

1 Department of Biotechnology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh-2202, Bangladesh

2Research and Development Wing, Genesis Research Consultancy Limited, Navaron, Jadabpur-7432, Jashore, Bangladesh

*Corresponding authors

Email address: mosharraf.btge@gmail.com (Md. Mosharraf Hossen)

doi: https://doi.org/10.69517/jber.2025.02.04.0001

ISSN: 3079-5346

Share:

Received:
14 December 2025

Revised:
01 March 2025

Accepted:
03 March 2025

Published:
08 March 2025

Highlights

  • DNA replication research enhances understanding of genetic stability and disease mechanisms.
  • Replication stress plays a crucial role in cancer development and targeted therapy strategies.
  • Structural and single-molecule studies reveal key insights into replication dynamics.
  • Precision medicine benefits from DNA replication-based biomarkers and therapeutic targets.
  • Advances in gene editing leverage DNA replication mechanisms for improved precision treatments.

Abstract

DNA replication is a fundamental biological process ensuring genetic continuity and cellular function. Recent advances in molecular biology have deepened our understanding of the mechanisms governing DNA replication and their implications for human health. Disruptions in replication processes are linked to various diseases, particularly cancer, where replication stress and genetic instability drive tumorigenesis. Cutting-edge research, including high-resolution structural studies, single-molecule technologies, and genomic and proteomic approaches, has provided valuable insights into the molecular machinery involved in replication. These discoveries have paved the way for precision medicine applications, including targeted cancer therapies, gene editing advancements, and biomarker identification. The development of ATR and CHK1 inhibitors, as well as PARP inhibitors for BRCA-mutated cancers, exemplifies the clinical potential of DNA replication research. Despite significant progress, challenges remain in translating these findings into effective therapies due to the complexity of replication dynamics and the need for specificity in targeting replication proteins. Future research integrating multidisciplinary approaches, artificial intelligence, and computational modeling will enhance our ability to harness DNA replication knowledge for therapeutic innovation. This review highlights the critical role of DNA replication studies in advancing precision medicine and underscores the necessity of continued exploration to improve patient outcomes.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Genetic stability, Replication fidelity, Oncogenesis, Molecular therapeutics, Genomic integrity

Molecular biology has long been at the forefront of scientific discovery, shedding light on the intricate processes that govern life at a cellular level. Among its most significant areas of study is DNA replication—a fundamental process that ensures the accurate duplication of genetic material during cell division (Song et al., 2023). Understanding the nuances of DNA replication not only unravels the mechanics of life but also serves as a cornerstone for transformative medical applications, particularly in the realm of precision medicine. DNA replication is essential for maintaining genetic continuity across generations of cells. It ensures that the daughter cells inherit an identical copy of the genome from the parent cell. This process involves a coordinated interplay of enzymes and proteins, including helicase, primase, DNA polymerase, and ligase, to accurately replicate the genome. Errors in this process can lead to mutations, genomic instability, and diseases such as cancer (Prindle and Loeb, 2012). Advances in understanding the molecular machinery involved in DNA replication have illuminated how cells preserve fidelity and repair replication errors, laying the groundwork for targeted therapeutic interventions (Li et al., 2023; Maffeo et al., 2019; Song et al., 2023).
Abnormalities in DNA replication are implicated in a wide range of diseases, most notably cancer. Cancer cells often exploit replication stress—a condition where DNA replication is hindered—to fuel their uncontrolled proliferation. Replication stress can arise from endogenous factors such as reactive oxygen species or exogenous factors like chemotherapeutic agents. Research into the molecular pathways that manage replication stress has led to breakthroughs in understanding tumorigenesis and identifying potential targets for cancer therapies (Gu et al., 2023; Song et al., 2023). Additionally, mutations in genes involved in the replication machinery, such as BRCA1 and BRCA2, have been linked to hereditary cancers, including breast and ovarian cancer. These findings underscore the importance of DNA replication research in understanding disease mechanisms and highlight its potential for developing personalized interventions (Dibitetto et al., 2024).
One of the most significant advancements in DNA replication research has been the application of high-resolution structural biology techniques, such as cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) and X-ray crystallography. These methods have provided detailed insights into the architecture of replication complexes, revealing how enzymes interact with DNA at the atomic level. This knowledge has facilitated the design of small molecules that can selectively inhibit or modulate specific components of the replication machinery, offering new avenues for therapeutic development (Benjin and Ling, 2020). Single-molecule studies have revolutionized our understanding of DNA replication dynamics. Techniques such as optical tweezers and single-molecule fluorescence microscopy allow researchers to observe replication processes in real-time, offering unprecedented insights into enzyme kinetics and replication fork behavior. These advancements have deepened our understanding of how replication is coordinated and regulated in both normal and stressed conditions (Sharma et al., 2024; Zhang et al., 2024).
High-throughput genomic and proteomic technologies have enabled the identification of novel replication-associated proteins and their interactions. Techniques such as chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq) and mass spectrometry have revealed the complex regulatory networks that govern replication. These insights are critical for understanding how disruptions in these networks contribute to disease and for identifying potential biomarkers for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes (Furey, 2012; He et al., 2023). Precision medicine aims to tailor medical treatments to individual patients based on their genetic, environmental, and lifestyle factors. DNA replication research has emerged as a crucial component of this paradigm, offering several promising applications (Strianese et al., 2020). The insights gained from studying replication stress have led to the development of targeted cancer therapies. For instance, inhibitors of ATR (ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related) and CHK1 (checkpoint kinase 1), key regulators of the replication stress response, are currently being evaluated in clinical trials. These inhibitors selectively target cancer cells that rely on replication stress pathways for survival, minimizing harm to normal cells (Ngoi et al., 2021; Qiu et al., 2018).
Another significant breakthrough has been the development of PARP (poly ADP-ribose polymerase) inhibitors for treating BRCA-mutated cancers. By exploiting synthetic lethality, these inhibitors target the compromised DNA repair mechanisms in cancer cells, leading to their selective elimination (Jain et al., 2025). Advances in DNA replication research have also contributed to the refinement of gene editing technologies, such as CRISPR-Cas9 (Dutta, 2024a, 2024b). Understanding how replication forks interact with edited DNA has improved the efficiency and precision of gene editing. This has significant implications for developing gene therapies to treat genetic disorders, including sickle cell anemia, cystic fibrosis, and Huntington’s disease (Liu et al., 2021). Research into DNA replication has uncovered a wealth of potential biomarkers for disease diagnosis and prognosis. For example, replication stress markers such as gamma-H2AX and RPA32 have been used to assess the efficacy of anticancer treatments and predict patient outcomes. These biomarkers enable more accurate stratification of patients, ensuring that they receive the most effective therapies (Huang et al., 2023; Song et al., 2023).
Despite remarkable progress, several challenges remain in translating DNA replication research into clinical applications. One significant hurdle is the complexity of replication dynamics in the context of whole organisms. While in vitro studies have provided valuable insights, understanding replication in the highly variable environment of living tissues requires innovative approaches (Song et al., 2023). Another challenge is the development of therapies that can effectively target replication machinery without causing off-target effects. The high degree of conservation in replication proteins across species increases the risk of unintended consequences, necessitating the design of highly specific therapeutic agents (Deneault, 2024). Future research should focus on integrating multidisciplinary approaches to address these challenges. Combining structural biology, single-molecule techniques, and computational modeling can provide a more comprehensive understanding of replication dynamics. Additionally, leveraging advances in artificial intelligence and machine learning can accelerate the discovery of novel therapeutic targets and predictive biomarkers (Procopio et al., 2023; Schwalbe et al., 2024).
DNA replication research represents a cornerstone of molecular biology, offering profound insights into the mechanisms of life and disease. The advances in this field have not only deepened our understanding of cellular processes but have also paved the way for transformative applications in precision medicine. From targeted cancer therapies to gene editing innovations, the potential of DNA replication research to improve human health is immense. By addressing current challenges and fostering interdisciplinary collaborations, the future of this field holds even greater promise for advancing medical science and patient care.


Acknowledgements

The author gratefully acknowledges the logistical and financial support provided by the Research and Development Wing, Genesis Research Consultancy Limited.

Ethics approval statement

None to declare.

Data availability

Not applicable.

Informed consent statement

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The author declare no competing interests.

Authors’ contribution

Md. Mosharraf Hossen contributed to the design and writing of this editorial. The author has read and approved the final version of the published editorial.

References

Benjin X and Ling L, 2020. Developments, applications, and prospects of cryo‐electron microscopy. Protein Science, 29(4): 872–882. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.3805

Deneault E, 2024. Recent therapeutic gene editing applications to genetic disorders. Current Issues in Molecular Biology, 46(5): 4147–4185. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb46050255

Dibitetto D, Widmer CA and Rottenberg S, 2024. PARPi, BRCA, and gaps: controversies and future research. Trends in Cancer, 10(9): 857–869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trecan.2024.06.008

Dutta KK 2024a. The gradual discovery of cell-type and context specificity of microRNAs. Journal of Bioscience and Environment Research, 2: 1–3. https://doi.org/10.69517/jber.2024.02.01.0001

Dutta KK 2024b. CRISPR-dCas9-mediated CpG island editing: A potential game-changer for diabetes treatment. Journal of Bioscience and Environment Research, 2: 10–13. https://doi.org/10.69517/jber.2025.02.01.0003

Furey TS, 2012. ChIP–seq and beyond: new and improved methodologies to detect and characterize protein–DNA interactions. Nature Reviews Genetics, 13(12): 840–852. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3306

Gu L, Hickey RJ and Malkas LH, 2023. Therapeutic targeting of DNA replication stress in cancer. Genes, 14(7): 1346. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14071346

He X, Chen X and Wang Y, (2023. Mass spectrometry for assessing protein–nucleic acid interactions. Analytical Chemistry, 95: 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.2c04353

Huang RH, Hong YK, Du H, Ke WQ, Lin BB and Li YL, 2023. A machine learning framework develops a DNA replication stress model for predicting clinical outcomes and therapeutic vulnerability in primary prostate cancer. Journal of Translational Medicine, 21: 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-023-03872-7

Jain A, Barge A and Parris CN, 2025. Combination strategies with PARP inhibitors in BRCA-mutated triple-negative breast cancer: overcoming resistance mechanisms. Oncogene, 44(4): 193–207. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-024-03227-6

Li Q, Qian W, Zhang Y, Hu L, Chen S and Xia Y, 2023. A new wave of innovations within the DNA damage response. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy, 8: 338. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-023-01548-8

Liu W, Li L, Jiang J, Wu M and Lin P, 2021. Applications and challenges of CRISPR-Cas gene-editing to disease treatment in clinics. Precision Clinical Medicine, 4(3): 179–191. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcmedi/pbab014

Maffeo C, Chou H and Aksimentiev A, 2019. Molecular mechanisms of DNA replication and repair machinery: Insights from microscopic simulations. Advanced Theory and Simulations, 2(5): 1800191. https://doi.org/10.1002/adts.201800191

Ngoi NYL, Pham MM, Tan DSP and Yap TA, 2021. Targeting the replication stress response through synthetic lethal strategies in cancer medicine. Trends in Cancer, 7(10): 930–957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trecan.2021.06.002

Prindle MJ and Loeb LA, 2012. DNA polymerase delta in dna replication and genome maintenance. Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis, 53(9): 666–682. https://doi.org/10.1002/em.21745

Procopio A, Cesarelli G, Donisi L, Merola A, Amato F and Cosentino C, 2023. Combined mechanistic modeling and machine-learning approaches in systems biology – A systematic literature review. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 240: 107681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2023.107681

Qiu Z, Oleinick NL and Zhang J, 2018. ATR/CHK1 inhibitors and cancer therapy. Radiotherapy and Oncology, 126(3): 450–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2017.09.043

Schwalbe H, Audergon P, Haley N, Amaro CA, Agirre J, Baldus M, Banci L, Baumeister W, Blackledge M, Carazo JM, Carugo KD, Celie P, Felli I, Hart DJ, Hauß T, Lehtiö L, Lindorff-Larsen K, Márquez J, Matagne A and Wilmanns M, 2024. The future of integrated structural biology. Structure, 32(10): 1563–1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2024.08.014

Sharma N, van Oijen AM, Spenkelink LM and Mueller SH, 2024. Insight into single-molecule imaging techniques for the study of prokaryotic genome maintenance. Chemical and Biomedical Imaging, 2(9): 595–614. https://doi.org/10.1021/cbmi.4c00037

Song H, Shen R, Mahasin H, Guo Y and Wang D, 2023. DNA replication: Mechanisms and therapeutic interventions for diseases. MedComm, 4: e210. https://doi.org/10.1002/mco2.210

Strianese O, Rizzo F, Ciccarelli M, Galasso G, D’Agostino Y, Salvati A, Del Giudice C, Tesorio P and Rusciano MR, 2020. Precision and personalized medicine: How genomic approach improves the management of cardiovascular and neurodegenerative disease. Genes, 11(7): 747. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11070747

Zhang YM, Li B and Wu WQ, 2024. Single-molecule insights into repetitive helicases. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 300(11): 107894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbc.2024.107894

 

[stm-calc id="1576"]