Policy

Self-archiving policy of GPCL’s journals

The self-archiving policy of Genesis Publishing Consortium Limited (GPCL) stands as a beacon in the realm of scholarly publishing, epitomizing the commitment to open-access principles and the widespread dissemination of scientific knowledge. In an era where access to research is a critical driver of progress, GPCL’s Self-Archiving Policy empowers authors, allowing them to share their research findings at various stages of the publication process. This comprehensive document explores the intricacies of GPCL’s Self-Archiving Policy, delving into the permissions granted to authors, the stages at which self-archiving is permitted, and the platforms through which authors can propagate their work.

Overview of self-archiving policy

The self-archiving policy of GPCL is meticulously designed to facilitate the philosophy of open access, providing authors with the flexibility to share their scholarly works without encountering restrictive paywalls. This policy encompasses manuscripts at different stages of the publication process, from pre-submitted drafts to the final published articles. Below, we dissect the key components of GPCL’s Self-Archiving Policy:

Pre-submitted manuscript
  • Authors are not merely encouraged but strongly urged to share pre-submission manuscripts on preprint servers or repositories before submitting them to the GPCL’s journals.
  • This proactive step serves a dual purpose, allowing authors to engage with researchers in their field even before the completion of the publication process in GPCL’s journals and potentially leading to increased citations.
  • Transparency is upheld by requiring the cover letter during submission to include details about the pre-submitted manuscript, such as the repository name and corresponding DOI number.
  • Authors are vested with the responsibility of communicating with the assigned editor regarding any voluntary comments received from subject experts in the deposited repositories.
Submitted manuscript
  • Authors have the liberty to archive manuscripts after submission but before the initiation of the peer-review process.
  • To ensure transparency and proper documentation, authors are required to send an email to the journal’s editorial office, providing details about the repository and the corresponding DOI number.
Under review state
  • Even during the peer-review process, authors are granted permission to archive manuscripts.
  • Ensuring transparency and accurate documentation, authors must send an email to the journal’s editorial office, containing information about the repository and the associated DOI number.
Accepted manuscripts
  • Following acceptance for publication, authors can archive the accepted version.
  • Authors are required to send an email to the editorial office, specifying details about the repository where the manuscript is archived and the corresponding DOI number.
Published articles
  • Post formal publication, authors retain the privilege to archive the article.
  • Authors are actively encouraged to disseminate the published article through various platforms, updating the DOI to the one provided by the journal.
Permissions and guidelines

Non-commercial purposes: The self-archiving privilege is extended to authors for non-commercial purposes, aligning with the commitment to fostering open access and the wider dissemination of scientific knowledge.

Transparency and documentation: To ensure transparency and accurate documentation, authors are required to communicate with the journal’s editorial office at each stage of self-archiving. This includes providing information on the repository, corresponding DOI numbers, and other essential details.

Dissemination channels

Authors are actively encouraged to share their research through various platforms, including:

Social media platforms: Such as Facebook, X.com, LinkedIn.

Research platforms: ResearchGate, Academia.edu, SlideShare, Figshare, and PublicationsList.org.

Institutional repositories: On university websites or research platforms.

Personal websites and blogs: Creating a personal space for research dissemination.

The impact of self-archiving

The impact of self-archiving on the visibility and reach of research cannot be overstated. By allowing authors to disseminate their work widely, GPCL contributes to the democratization of knowledge. This policy encourages collaboration, increases the visibility of research, and enhances the impact of scholarly works. Moreover, it aligns with the ethos of open access, fostering a culture of transparency and accessibility.

The role of repositories in self-archiving

Repositories play a pivotal role in the self-archiving process. They serve as virtual spaces where authors can deposit and share their research outputs. Preprint servers, institutional repositories, and subject-based repositories offer a platform for early sharing and collaboration. By communicating with these repositories, authors ensure that their work is not only accessible but also part of a broader scholarly conversation.

Challenges and considerations

While self-archiving is a powerful tool for research dissemination, it comes with its set of challenges and considerations. Authors must navigate copyright agreements, seek permissions for any copyrighted material used, and carefully adhere to the guidelines provided by GPCL. Furthermore, authors should be vigilant about updating DOIs and communicating effectively at each stage of the self-archiving process.

GPCL’s commitment to open access

GPCL’s self-archiving policy is a testament to its commitment to open-access principles. By empowering authors, GPCL contributes to a more equitable and accessible scholarly landscape. This policy not only aligns with the broader open-access movement but also positions GPCL as a champion of transparency, collaboration, and the democratization of knowledge.

GPCL’s self-archiving policy is a robust framework that empowers authors to share their research findings openly. By allowing self-archiving at various stages and through diverse platforms, GPCL contributes to the democratization of knowledge. This policy aligns with the ethos of open access, fostering collaboration, and increasing the impact of scholarly works. GPCL is dedicated to supporting authors in their efforts to disseminate research globally, ensuring that valuable contributions are accessible to the widest possible audience. Through this policy, GPCL continues to champion openness, transparency, and the advancement of scientific knowledge. The impact of GPCL’s self-archiving policy extends beyond individual authors, shaping a future where research is freely accessible, collaborative, and transformative.

Self-archiving policy

Do you have any question? Ask us

    [stm-calc id="1576"]